ACIW
Price
$44.92
Change
-$0.03 (-0.07%)
Updated
Jul 25, 01:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.53B
13 days until earnings call
HUBS
Price
$560.44
Change
+$8.28 (+1.50%)
Updated
Jul 25, 01:16 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
32.27B
12 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACIW vs HUBS

Header iconACIW vs HUBS Comparison
Open Charts ACIW vs HUBSBanner chart's image
ACI Worldwide
Price$44.92
Change-$0.03 (-0.07%)
Volume$1.36K
Capitalization3.53B
HUBSPOT
Price$560.44
Change+$8.28 (+1.50%)
Volume$100
Capitalization32.27B
ACIW vs HUBS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACIW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACIW vs. HUBS commentary
Jul 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACIW is a Buy and HUBS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2025
Stock price -- (ACIW: $44.95 vs. HUBS: $552.16)
Brand notoriety: ACIW and HUBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACIW: 93% vs. HUBS: 73%
Market capitalization -- ACIW: $3.53B vs. HUBS: $32.27B
ACIW [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.53B. HUBS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $32.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACIW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ACIW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACIW is a better buy in the long-term than HUBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACIW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACIW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HUBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ACIW and HUBS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ACIW (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.64% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was +4.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACIW is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

HUBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.20% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUBS($32.3B) has a higher market cap than ACIW($3.53B). ACIW YTD gains are higher at: -13.408 vs. HUBS (-20.754). ACIW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 360M vs. HUBS (-81.23M). HUBS has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. ACIW (164M). HUBS has less debt than ACIW: HUBS (788M) vs ACIW (1.08B). HUBS has higher revenues than ACIW: HUBS (2.17B) vs ACIW (1.45B).
ACIWHUBSACIW / HUBS
Capitalization3.53B32.3B11%
EBITDA360M-81.23M-443%
Gain YTD-13.408-20.75465%
P/E Ratio28.92N/A-
Revenue1.45B2.17B67%
Total Cash164M1.39B12%
Total Debt1.08B788M137%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACIW vs HUBS: Fundamental Ratings
ACIW
HUBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7110
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5061
SMR RATING
1..100
4690
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6261
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9281
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACIW's Valuation (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ACIW’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

ACIW's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (61) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ACIW’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

ACIW's SMR Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (90) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ACIW’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ACIW (62) in the null industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to ACIW’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's P/E Growth Rating (81) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ACIW (92) in the null industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to ACIW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACIWHUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACIW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TFPN23.410.10
+0.41%
Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asst Trnd ETF
JULJ24.930.01
+0.04%
Innovator Premium Income 30 Bar ETF -Jul
BRNY45.550.01
+0.03%
Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF
FLCB21.30-0.03
-0.14%
Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF
MSSM48.06-0.42
-0.87%
Morgan Stanley Pathway Sm-Md Cp Eq ETF

ACIW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACIW has been loosely correlated with CPAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACIW jumps, then CPAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACIW
1D Price
Change %
ACIW100%
-2.20%
CPAY - ACIW
56%
Loosely correlated
-3.08%
HUBS - ACIW
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.56%
QTWO - ACIW
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.52%
EEFT - ACIW
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.33%
EVTC - ACIW
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
More

HUBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBS
1D Price
Change %
HUBS100%
-1.56%
CRM - HUBS
73%
Closely correlated
+1.56%
NOW - HUBS
68%
Closely correlated
+4.16%
TEAM - HUBS
66%
Closely correlated
-1.35%
SHOP - HUBS
66%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
CLSK - HUBS
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
More