ACIW saw its Momentum Indicator move above the 0 level on October 05, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new upward move. Traders may want to consider buying the stock or buying call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 93 similar instances where the indicator turned positive. In 71 of the 93 cases, the stock moved higher in the following days. The odds of a move higher are at 76%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for ACIW just turned positive on October 02, 2026. Looking at past instances where ACIW's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 40 of 53 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 75%.
ACIW moved above its 50-day moving average on October 15, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for ACIW crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 20, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 12 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
Following a +4.85% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where ACIW advanced for three days, in 222 of 328 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 151 of 226 cases where ACIW Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 67%.
The RSI Indicator has been in the overbought zone for 1 day. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 19 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where ACIW declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 62%.
ACIW broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 16 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 33 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 34 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 91, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 41 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. ACIW’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 54 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 55 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (3.941) is normal, around the industry mean (16.593). P/E Ratio (26.680) is within average values for comparable stocks, (57.337). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (3.648). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.283) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.917) is also within normal values, averaging (103.889).
The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an uptrend is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 12 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
MNDO may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The 10-day moving average for MNDO crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 30, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 6 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 38%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MNDO declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 54%.
The Aroon Indicator for MNDO entered a downward trend on November 02, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 5 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.746) is normal, around the industry mean (-1.884). P/E Ratio (5.556) is within average values for comparable stocks, (15.540). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.840) is also within normal values, averaging (2.824). MNDO has a moderately high Dividend Yield (0.990) as compared to the industry average of (0.072). P/S Ratio (1.108) is also within normal values, averaging (70.854).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 58 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 72 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. MNDO’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 74 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. MNDO’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 94, placing this stock worse than average.
ACIW | MNDO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 55 Fair valued | 5 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | 58 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 72 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 74 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 33 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MNDO's Valuation (5) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACIW (55) in the null industry. This means that MNDO’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACIW’s over the last 12 months.
ACIW's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNDO (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that ACIW’s stock grew significantly faster than MNDO’s over the last 12 months.
ACIW's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as MNDO (58) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that ACIW’s stock grew similarly to MNDO’s over the last 12 months.
ACIW's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as MNDO (72) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that ACIW’s stock grew similarly to MNDO’s over the last 12 months.
ACIW's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNDO (74) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that ACIW’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNDO’s over the last 12 months.
| ACIW | MNDO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 62% | 6 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 55% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACIW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while MNDO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACIW’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNDO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
ACIW (@Computer Communications) experienced а +4.89% price change this week, while MNDO (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.05% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -6.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.29%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.06%.
ACIW is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
MNDO is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Packaged Software (-1.60% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACIW has been loosely correlated with BOX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACIW jumps, then BOX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACIW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACIW | 100% | +0.05% | ||
| BOX - ACIW | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| EEFT - ACIW | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| QTWO - ACIW | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| HUBS - ACIW | 55% Loosely correlated | -3.14% | ||
| MQ - ACIW | 53% Loosely correlated | -4.40% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor tells us that MNDO and CPAY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNDO and CPAY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNDO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNDO | 100% | +2.07% | ||
| CPAY - MNDO | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.66% | ||
| ACIW - MNDO | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.05% | ||
| ALIT - MNDO | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.43% | ||
| INTA - MNDO | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
| FRSH - MNDO | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.42% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BBBS | 50.03 | 0.02 | +0.03% |
| BondBloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) | |||
| DLN | 100.28 | -0.15 | -0.15% |
| WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN) | |||
| EIPX | 33.62 | -0.14 | -0.41% |
| FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) | |||
| USG | 30.04 | -0.13 | -0.43% |
| USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund ETF (USG) | |||
| TSLG | 5.55 | -0.15 | -2.63% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) | |||