Ad is loading...
ACKDF
Price
$4.09
Change
-$0.13 (-3.08%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
OMAB
Price
$63.09
Change
-$2.76 (-4.19%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
87 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ACKDF vs OMAB

Header iconACKDF vs OMAB Comparison
Open Charts ACKDF vs OMABBanner chart's image
Auckland International Airport
Price$4.09
Change-$0.13 (-3.08%)
Volume$660
CapitalizationN/A
Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte S.A.B. de C.V. ADS
Price$63.09
Change-$2.76 (-4.19%)
Volume$76.46K
CapitalizationN/A
ACKDF vs OMAB Comparison Chart
Loading...
OMAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACKDF vs. OMAB commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACKDF is a Hold and OMAB is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (ACKDF: $4.09 vs. OMAB: $63.09)
Brand notoriety: ACKDF and OMAB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Transportation industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACKDF: 34% vs. OMAB: 102%
Market capitalization -- ACKDF: $7.57B vs. OMAB: $3.82B
ACKDF [@Other Transportation] is valued at $7.57B. OMAB’s [@Other Transportation] market capitalization is $3.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Transportation] industry ranges from $29.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Transportation] industry is $7.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACKDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOMAB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ACKDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OMAB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMAB is a better buy in the long-term than ACKDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OMAB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • OMAB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

ACKDF (@Other Transportation) experienced а -11.90% price change this week, while OMAB (@Other Transportation) price change was -4.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Transportation industry was -2.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

OMAB is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Transportation (-2.68% weekly)

Other Transportation includes transportation services like providing airport ground transportation, airport management and equipment, shipping services, as well as businesses that operate bridges, expressways and other public services such as taxis and subways. Grupo Aero-pac, Corporacion America Airports S.A. and Matson, Inc. are some of the major companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACKDF($7.58B) has a higher market cap than OMAB($3.82B). ACKDF has higher P/E ratio than OMAB: ACKDF (133.33) vs OMAB (14.82). ACKDF YTD gains are higher at: -21.376 vs. OMAB (-23.232). OMAB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.4B vs. ACKDF (260M). OMAB has higher revenues than ACKDF: OMAB (12.9B) vs ACKDF (436M).
ACKDFOMABACKDF / OMAB
Capitalization7.58B3.82B198%
EBITDA260M7.4B4%
Gain YTD-21.376-23.23292%
P/E Ratio133.3314.82900%
Revenue436M12.9B3%
Total Cash24.7MN/A-
Total Debt1.48BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACKDF vs OMAB: Fundamental Ratings
ACKDF
OMAB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5018
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10053
SMR RATING
1..100
9119
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7462
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
166
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMAB's Valuation (33) in the Other Transportation industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACKDF (100) in the null industry. This means that OMAB’s stock grew significantly faster than ACKDF’s over the last 12 months.

OMAB's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Other Transportation industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACKDF (100) in the null industry. This means that OMAB’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACKDF’s over the last 12 months.

OMAB's SMR Rating (19) in the Other Transportation industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACKDF (91) in the null industry. This means that OMAB’s stock grew significantly faster than ACKDF’s over the last 12 months.

OMAB's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as ACKDF (74) in the null industry. This means that OMAB’s stock grew similarly to ACKDF’s over the last 12 months.

ACKDF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OMAB (66) in the Other Transportation industry. This means that ACKDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OMAB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OMAB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OMAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAASX12.190.05
+0.41%
DWS RREEF Real Assets S
MLOIX9.04-0.03
-0.33%
Cohen & Steers Future of Energy I
PCPTX11.24-0.08
-0.71%
Principal SmallCap Value II R1
MLVOX21.59-0.21
-0.96%
MFS Low Volatility Equity R2
RGABX71.73-1.21
-1.66%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2

ACKDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACKDF and UZAPF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACKDF and UZAPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACKDF
1D Price
Change %
ACKDF100%
-3.02%
UZAPF - ACKDF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AEOXF - ACKDF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OMAB - ACKDF
11%
Poorly correlated
-4.19%
PAC - ACKDF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
BLDE - ACKDF
4%
Poorly correlated
-7.60%
More

OMAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMAB has been closely correlated with PAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMAB jumps, then PAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMAB
1D Price
Change %
OMAB100%
-4.19%
PAC - OMAB
81%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
ASR - OMAB
74%
Closely correlated
-0.92%
CAAP - OMAB
33%
Poorly correlated
-3.49%
ASRMF - OMAB
27%
Poorly correlated
-5.27%
CHRRF - OMAB
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
More