Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACLCX vs RMEBX
ACLCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts ACLCX vs RMEBX
ACLCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACLCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACLCX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. ACLCX (1.95B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than ACLCX: RMEBX (1.00) vs ACLCX (0.54). ACLCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: ACLCX (25 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). ACLCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). ACLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACLCX: RMEBX (250) vs ACLCX (2500). ACLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.61 vs. RMEBX (7.56). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.13 vs. ACLCX (0.78).
| ACLCX | RMEBX | ACLCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.07 | 182% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.07 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.326 | 9.246 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.95B | 118B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 1.00 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.61 | 7.56 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.78 | 31.88 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.78 | 36.13 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.34 | 89.32 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement