Advertisement
ACM vs KBR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? AECOM (ACM) vs. KBR, Inc. (KBR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- AECOM (ACM) and KBR, Inc. (KBR) both operate in the engineering and construction sector, focusing on infrastructure and government services, but ACM has a larger market cap of $10.4 billion compared to KBR's $4.1 billion.
- Recent market activity shows both stocks under pressure, with ACM down about 6% over the past month and KBR down around 12%, amid broader industrials sector volatility.
- KBR reported stronger Q1 2026 earnings, beating estimates with adjusted EPS of $0.96 and securing contracts like a $449 million U.S. Army extension, boosting short-term sentiment.
- Analysts favor both with average price targets implying upside—$121.75 for ACM (51% potential) and $48.62 for KBR (49% potential)—reflecting confidence in infrastructure demand.
- Year-to-date, both trail the S&P 500, but ACM shows relative stability with lower volatility in recent weeks.
- Sector tailwinds from government spending on defense and infrastructure support long-term positioning for both stocks.
Introduction
AECOM (ACM) and KBR, Inc. (KBR) are prominent players in the engineering and construction sector, delivering infrastructure consulting, design, and technology solutions to governments and commercial clients. This comparison is particularly relevant for investors tracking industrials amid rising demand for sustainable infrastructure, defense modernization, and energy transition projects. Traders focused on relative performance may note their shared exposure to public sector contracts while differing in scale and specialization—ACM emphasizes broad infrastructure advisory, and KBR leans into mission-critical government solutions. In the current market, both face headwinds from sector rotation but benefit from backlog growth and analyst optimism on long-term catalysts like federal spending.
AECOM Overview and Recent Performance
AECOM (ACM), headquartered in Dallas, Texas, is a global leader in professional infrastructure consulting services. The company operates through Americas, International, and AECOM Capital segments, providing advisory, planning, architectural and engineering design, construction management, and real estate development for end markets including transportation, water, environmental, and energy. With approximately 51,000 employees, ACM generates trailing twelve-month (TTM) revenue of $15.96 billion and net income of $601 million.
In recent market activity, ACM shares have traded around $80.59, down roughly 6% over the past month and 15% year-to-date, underperforming the S&P 500's 8% gain. This pullback reflects broader industrials weakness, though the stock remains above its 52-week low of $79.01. Sentiment has been influenced by contract wins, such as a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers environmental services deal in late April, and anticipation for Q2 earnings on May 11. Analysts maintain a positive outlook with an average target of $121.75, supported by a trailing P/E of 17.83 and strong backlog visibility.
KBR Overview and Recent Performance
KBR, Inc. (KBR), based in Houston, Texas, delivers scientific, technology, and engineering solutions through Government Solutions and Sustainable Technology Solutions segments. It supports defense, intelligence, space, and energy clients with services like systems engineering, cyber analytics, and proprietary process technologies for decarbonization and energy efficiency. Employing about 36,000 people, KBR reports TTM revenue of $7.69 billion and net income of $433 million.
Recent weeks have seen KBR shares around $32.54, declining about 12% in the past month and 19% year-to-date, lagging the S&P 500. The stock hit a 52-week low near $31.56 amid sector pressures. Positive developments include Q1 2026 results beating estimates—adjusted EPS of $0.96 versus $0.91 expected, revenue of $1.92 billion—and new contracts like a $449 million U.S. Army LOGCAP extension and investments in lithium extraction tech. These have tempered downside, with analysts' $48.62 target signaling potential rebound, underpinned by a low trailing P/E of 9.60 and reaffirmed FY26 guidance.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and sectors. Tickeron offers over 351 AI trading bots in total, with 25 featured as trending based on current market suitability and strong metrics like annualized returns up to +285%, win rates of 70–88%, and profit factors reaching 11.70. These bots employ AI/ML models, trend analysis, multi-agent systems, and take-profit/stop-loss corridors (e.g., TP 3%/SL 2%) on timeframes from 5 to 60 minutes, targeting high-growth areas such as semiconductors, industrials, space infrastructure, data centers, and energy. Many have outperformed the S&P 500 recently, with semiconductor bots leading quarterly gains. Explore these bots to align with your trading style and market conditions.
Head-to-Head Comparison
AECOM (ACM) and KBR, Inc. (KBR) share engineering roots in infrastructure but diverge in business models: ACM focuses on broad consulting and design across transportation and environmental projects, while KBR emphasizes defense, space, and sustainable tech solutions with proprietary processes. Growth drivers differ—ACM benefits from global infrastructure spending, KBR from U.S. government contracts like LOGCAP.
Recent momentum favors neither decisively, with both down in recent weeks (ACM -6% monthly, KBR -12%), though KBR's earnings beat provides a lift. Risk factors include project delays and debt loads (both over 130% debt/equity), but ACM's larger scale ($16B revenue vs. $7.7B) offers stability. Sector exposure overlaps in industrials, yet KBR has stronger defense tilt. Market sentiment leans positive for both, with comparable upside to targets, though KBR's lower valuation presents a value trade-off against ACM's consistency.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors AECOM (ACM) over KBR, Inc. (KBR) based on greater trend consistency, lower relative volatility in recent market activity, and superior scale in backlog and revenue streams. While KBR shows catalysts from defense contracts and earnings momentum, ACM's positioning in diverse infrastructure end-markets suggests higher probability of stable outperformance amid ongoing sector recovery.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACM is a StrongBuy and KBR is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKBR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ACM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- KBR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KBR’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ACM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- KBR’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ACM (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -4.25% price change this week, while KBR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -2.13% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +0.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.92%.
Reported Earning Dates
ACM is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.
KBR is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (+0.18% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| ACM | KBR | ACM / KBR | |
| Capitalization | 8.94B | 4.48B | 200% |
| EBITDA | 1.3B | 916M | 141% |
| Gain YTD | -26.505 | -11.644 | 228% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.53 | 10.43 | 139% |
| Revenue | 16B | 7.69B | 208% |
| Total Cash | 1.03B | 321M | 322% |
| Total Debt | 3.22B | 2.81B | 114% |
ACM | KBR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 32 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 30 Undervalued | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | 36 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 89 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KBR's Valuation (27) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as ACM (30). This means that KBR’s stock grew similarly to ACM’s over the last 12 months.
ACM's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as KBR (100). This means that ACM’s stock grew similarly to KBR’s over the last 12 months.
KBR's SMR Rating (36) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as ACM (43). This means that KBR’s stock grew similarly to ACM’s over the last 12 months.
KBR's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as ACM (81). This means that KBR’s stock grew similarly to ACM’s over the last 12 months.
ACM's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as KBR (89). This means that ACM’s stock grew similarly to KBR’s over the last 12 months.
| ACM | KBR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 42% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 54% | 8 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 58% |
Advertisement
ACM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACM has been loosely correlated with J. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACM jumps, then J could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACM | 100% | +1.47% | ||
| J - ACM | 63% Loosely correlated | +3.74% | ||
| STN - ACM | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.95% | ||
| TTEK - ACM | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.84% | ||
| EXPO - ACM | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.29% | ||
| KBR - ACM | 39% Loosely correlated | +3.33% | ||
More | ||||
KBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KBR has been loosely correlated with J. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KBR jumps, then J could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KBR | 100% | +3.33% | ||
| J - KBR | 54% Loosely correlated | +3.74% | ||
| TTEK - KBR | 47% Loosely correlated | +2.84% | ||
| EXPO - KBR | 44% Loosely correlated | +2.29% | ||
| ACM - KBR | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.47% | ||
| STN - KBR | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.95% | ||
More | ||||