ACMTA
Price
$29.05
Change
-$4.45 (-13.28%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
25.01M
HIPO
Price
$26.16
Change
-$0.05 (-0.19%)
Updated
Jan 8 closing price
Capitalization
444.16M
Ad is loading...

ACMTA vs HIPO

Header iconACMTA vs HIPO Comparison
Open Charts ACMTA vs HIPOBanner chart's image
ACMAT
Price$29.05
Change-$4.45 (-13.28%)
Volume$300
Capitalization25.01M
Hippo Holdings
Price$26.16
Change-$0.05 (-0.19%)
Volume$150.16K
Capitalization444.16M
ACMTA vs HIPO Comparison Chart
Loading...
HIPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACMTA vs. HIPO commentary
Jan 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACMTA is a Buy and HIPO is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 09, 2025
Stock price -- (ACMTA: $29.05 vs. HIPO: $26.16)
Brand notoriety: ACMTA and HIPO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACMTA: 100% vs. HIPO: 71%
Market capitalization -- ACMTA: $25.01M vs. HIPO: $444.16M
ACMTA [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $25.01M. HIPO’s [@Specialty Insurance] market capitalization is $444.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $14.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACMTA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHIPO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ACMTA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HIPO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ACMTA and HIPO are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HIPO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HIPO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

ACMTA (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HIPO (@Specialty Insurance) price change was -2.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was -2.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACMTA is expected to report earnings on Nov 19, 2024.

HIPO is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (-2.21% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HIPO($444M) has a higher market cap than ACMTA($25M). ACMTA has higher P/E ratio than HIPO: ACMTA (66.67) vs HIPO (0.45). ACMTA YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. HIPO (-2.279). HIPO has more cash in the bank: 401M vs. ACMTA (6.14M). ACMTA has less debt than HIPO: ACMTA (8.57M) vs HIPO (14.8M). HIPO has higher revenues than ACMTA: HIPO (210M) vs ACMTA (3.36M).
ACMTAHIPOACMTA / HIPO
Capitalization25M444M6%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.000-2.279-
P/E Ratio66.670.4514,689%
Revenue3.36M210M2%
Total Cash6.14M401M2%
Total Debt8.57M14.8M58%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACMTA: Fundamental Ratings
ACMTA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
40
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
7
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
70
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACMTAHIPO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HIPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
YXI14.140.08
+0.54%
ProShares Short FTSE China 50
XFIV47.800.06
+0.12%
BondBloxx Bloomberg FiveYrTrgDurUSTrsETF
QULL50.90N/A
N/A
ETRACS 2x Lvrgd MSCI US Qlty Fctr TR ETN
NFRA54.43-0.12
-0.21%
FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infras ETF
HTAB19.26-0.06
-0.31%
Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF

ACMTA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACMTA and BZLYF have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACMTA and BZLYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACMTA
1D Price
Change %
ACMTA100%
N/A
BZLYF - ACMTA
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HIPO - ACMTA
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
JTGPF - ACMTA
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LCSHF - ACMTA
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACMT - ACMTA
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HIPO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HIPO and FNF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HIPO and FNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HIPO
1D Price
Change %
HIPO100%
-0.19%
FNF - HIPO
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
ACT - HIPO
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
TIPT - HIPO
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
FAF - HIPO
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
TRUP - HIPO
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.87%
More