ACMTA
Price
$34.34
Change
+$4.34 (+14.47%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
25.01M
HIPO
Price
$24.21
Change
-$0.34 (-1.38%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
444.16M
Ad is loading...

ACMTA vs HIPO

Header iconACMTA vs HIPO Comparison
Open Charts ACMTA vs HIPOBanner chart's image
ACMAT
Price$34.34
Change+$4.34 (+14.47%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization25.01M
Hippo Holdings
Price$24.21
Change-$0.34 (-1.38%)
Volume$99.54K
Capitalization444.16M
ACMTA vs HIPO Comparison Chart
Loading...
HIPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACMTA vs. HIPO commentary
Apr 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACMTA is a Hold and HIPO is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 28, 2025
Stock price -- (ACMTA: $34.34 vs. HIPO: $24.21)
Brand notoriety: ACMTA and HIPO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACMTA: 415% vs. HIPO: 49%
Market capitalization -- ACMTA: $25.01M vs. HIPO: $444.16M
ACMTA [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $25.01M. HIPO’s [@Specialty Insurance] market capitalization is $444.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $14.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACMTA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHIPO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ACMTA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HIPO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACMTA is a better buy in the long-term than HIPO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HIPO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HIPO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

ACMTA (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HIPO (@Specialty Insurance) price change was -0.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was +1.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACMTA is expected to report earnings on Mar 16, 2025.

HIPO is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (+1.51% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HIPO($444M) has a higher market cap than ACMTA($25M). ACMTA has higher P/E ratio than HIPO: ACMTA (66.67) vs HIPO (0.45). ACMTA YTD gains are higher at: 18.210 vs. HIPO (-9.563). HIPO has more cash in the bank: 401M vs. ACMTA (6.14M). ACMTA has less debt than HIPO: ACMTA (8.57M) vs HIPO (14.8M). HIPO has higher revenues than ACMTA: HIPO (210M) vs ACMTA (3.36M).
ACMTAHIPOACMTA / HIPO
Capitalization25M444M6%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.210-9.563-190%
P/E Ratio66.670.4514,689%
Revenue3.36M210M2%
Total Cash6.14M401M2%
Total Debt8.57M14.8M58%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACMTA: Fundamental Ratings
ACMTA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81
SMR RATING
1..100
9
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HIPO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HIPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CONL19.211.00
+5.49%
GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF
SPMB21.920.08
+0.37%
SPDR® Portfolio Mortgage Backed Bond ETF
RAYD32.450.10
+0.30%
Rayliant Quantitative Dev Mkt Eq ETF
NFLT22.37N/A
N/A
Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sect Bd ETF
ECLN30.48-0.10
-0.32%
First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF

ACMTA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACMTA and BZLYF have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACMTA and BZLYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACMTA
1D Price
Change %
ACMTA100%
N/A
BZLYF - ACMTA
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HIPO - ACMTA
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.38%
JTGPF - ACMTA
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LCSHF - ACMTA
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACMT - ACMTA
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HIPO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIPO has been loosely correlated with FNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HIPO jumps, then FNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HIPO
1D Price
Change %
HIPO100%
-1.38%
FNF - HIPO
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
TIPT - HIPO
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.94%
EIG - HIPO
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
FAF - HIPO
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.65%
MTG - HIPO
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
More