Advertisement
HIPO vs UFCS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIPO is a StrongBuy and UFCS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HIPO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUFCS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- HIPO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- UFCS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HIPO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UFCS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HIPO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- UFCS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
HIPO (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +4.74% price change this week, while UFCS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +5.53% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +3.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.59%.
Reported Earning Dates
HIPO is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
UFCS is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (+3.30% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| HIPO | UFCS | HIPO / UFCS | |
| Capitalization | 881M | 1.4B | 63% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.004 | 52.610 | 21% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.09 | 10.19 | 70% |
| Revenue | 507M | 1.43B | 36% |
| Total Cash | 445M | 1.34B | 33% |
| Total Debt | 50.7M | 146M | 35% |
UFCS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 38 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HIPO | UFCS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 54% |
Advertisement
HIPO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIPO has been loosely correlated with LMND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HIPO jumps, then LMND could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HIPO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIPO | 100% | +3.28% | ||
| LMND - HIPO | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| ROOT - HIPO | 43% Loosely correlated | -16.21% | ||
| FNF - HIPO | 39% Loosely correlated | +2.82% | ||
| AIZ - HIPO | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| UFCS - HIPO | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.07% | ||
More | ||||
UFCS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UFCS has been loosely correlated with DGICA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UFCS jumps, then DGICA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UFCS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UFCS | 100% | +1.07% | ||
| DGICA - UFCS | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
| HIG - UFCS | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.63% | ||
| SAFT - UFCS | 56% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CINF - UFCS | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| THG - UFCS | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.02% | ||
More | ||||