Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACMTX vs CWGCX
ACMTX vs CWGCX Comparison
Open Charts ACMTX vs CWGCX
ACMTX vs CWGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACMTX vs. CWGCX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACMTX is a Hold and CWGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. ACMTX (802M). ACMTX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: ACMTX (4.73) vs CWGCX (0.71). ACMTX was incepted earlier than CWGCX: ACMTX (17 years) vs CWGCX (26 years). ACMTX (2.00) is less costly to investors than CWGCX (1.48). ACMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACMTX: CWGCX (250) vs ACMTX (2500). ACMTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.91 vs. CWGCX (9.77). ACMTX return over 5 years is better than : 50.81 vs. CWGCX (29.39).
| ACMTX | CWGCX | ACMTX / CWGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.48 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.48 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.491 | 14.661 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 802M | 158B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.73 | 0.71 | 669% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.91 | 9.77 | 245% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.92 | 47.18 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.81 | 29.39 | 173% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.99 | 89.09 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement