Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACMTX vs CWGFX
ACMTX vs CWGFX Comparison
Open Charts ACMTX vs CWGFX
ACMTX vs CWGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACMTX vs. CWGFX commentary
Jun 29, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACMTX is a Hold and CWGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. ACMTX (751M). ACMTX pays higher dividends than CWGFX: ACMTX (4.85) vs CWGFX (1.30). ACMTX was incepted earlier than CWGFX: ACMTX (16 years) vs CWGFX (25 years). ACMTX (2.00) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). ACMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. CWGFX (44.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACMTX: CWGFX (250) vs ACMTX (2500). ACMTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.43 vs. CWGFX (15.46). ACMTX return over 5 years is better than : 42.62 vs. CWGFX (30.93).
| ACMTX | CWGFX | ACMTX / CWGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.79 | 249% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.79 | 253% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.415 | 12.926 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 751M | 160B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.85 | 1.30 | 374% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.43 | 15.46 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.46 | 48.25 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.62 | 30.93 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.52 | 104.62 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement