Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACMTX vs CWGFX
ACMTX vs CWGFX Comparison
Open Charts ACMTX vs CWGFX
ACMTX vs CWGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACMTX vs. CWGFX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACMTX is a Hold and CWGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. ACMTX (779M). ACMTX pays higher dividends than CWGFX: ACMTX (4.88) vs CWGFX (1.31). ACMTX was incepted earlier than CWGFX: ACMTX (16 years) vs CWGFX (25 years). ACMTX (2.00) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). ACMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. CWGFX (44.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACMTX: CWGFX (250) vs ACMTX (2500). ACMTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.00 vs. CWGFX (15.55). ACMTX return over 5 years is better than : 46.64 vs. CWGFX (32.96).
| ACMTX | CWGFX | ACMTX / CWGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.79 | 249% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.79 | 253% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.660 | 13.986 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 779M | 158B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.88 | 1.31 | 372% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.00 | 15.55 | 180% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.12 | 43.96 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.64 | 32.96 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.68 | 93.69 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers