Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACMTX vs CWGFX
ACMTX vs CWGFX Comparison
Open Charts ACMTX vs CWGFX
ACMTX vs CWGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACMTX vs. CWGFX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACMTX is a Hold and CWGFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. ACMTX (802M). ACMTX pays higher dividends than CWGFX: ACMTX (4.73) vs CWGFX (1.29). ACMTX was incepted earlier than CWGFX: ACMTX (17 years) vs CWGFX (26 years). ACMTX (2.00) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). ACMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. CWGFX (44.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACMTX: CWGFX (250) vs ACMTX (2500). ACMTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.91 vs. CWGFX (10.60). ACMTX return over 5 years is better than : 50.81 vs. CWGFX (33.22).
| ACMTX | CWGFX | ACMTX / CWGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.79 | 249% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.79 | 253% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.491 | 15.196 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 802M | 158B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.73 | 1.29 | 367% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.91 | 10.60 | 225% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.92 | 50.42 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.81 | 33.22 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.99 | 95.79 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement