ACOPY
Price
$5.18
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.46B
UTZ
Price
$13.18
Change
-$0.04 (-0.30%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.5B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACOPY vs UTZ

Header iconACOPY vs UTZ Comparison
Open Charts ACOPY vs UTZBanner chart's image
The A2 Milk
Price$5.18
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$102
Capitalization2.46B
Utz Brands
Price$13.18
Change-$0.04 (-0.30%)
Volume$714.18K
Capitalization1.5B
ACOPY vs UTZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACOPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACOPY vs. UTZ commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACOPY is a Hold and UTZ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ACOPY: $5.18 vs. UTZ: $13.18)
Brand notoriety: ACOPY and UTZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACOPY: 4% vs. UTZ: 59%
Market capitalization -- ACOPY: $2.46B vs. UTZ: $1.5B
ACOPY [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $2.46B. UTZ’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $1.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACOPY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUTZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ACOPY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UTZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACOPY is a better buy in the long-term than UTZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACOPY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UTZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACOPY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UTZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UTZ is a better buy in the short-term than ACOPY.

Price Growth

ACOPY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +0.10% price change this week, while UTZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +3.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

UTZ is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+1.77% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACOPY($2.46B) has a higher market cap than UTZ($1.5B). UTZ has higher P/E ratio than ACOPY: UTZ (81.45) vs ACOPY (28.74). ACOPY YTD gains are higher at: 55.063 vs. UTZ (-15.007). ACOPY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 223M vs. UTZ (99.2M). ACOPY has more cash in the bank: 887M vs. UTZ (52M). ACOPY has less debt than UTZ: ACOPY (124M) vs UTZ (985M). ACOPY has higher revenues than UTZ: ACOPY (1.57B) vs UTZ (1.44B).
ACOPYUTZACOPY / UTZ
Capitalization2.46B1.5B164%
EBITDA223M99.2M225%
Gain YTD55.063-15.007-367%
P/E Ratio28.7481.4535%
Revenue1.57B1.44B109%
Total Cash887M52M1,706%
Total Debt124M985M13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACOPY vs UTZ: Fundamental Ratings
ACOPY
UTZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10092
SMR RATING
1..100
4384
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4678
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
37100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UTZ's Valuation (51) in the null industry is in the same range as ACOPY (59). This means that UTZ’s stock grew similarly to ACOPY’s over the last 12 months.

UTZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as ACOPY (100). This means that UTZ’s stock grew similarly to ACOPY’s over the last 12 months.

ACOPY's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UTZ (84). This means that ACOPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

ACOPY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as UTZ (78). This means that ACOPY’s stock grew similarly to UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

ACOPY's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UTZ (100). This means that ACOPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACOPYUTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACOPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SZCIX53.100.50
+0.95%
DWS Small Cap Core Inst
FNSTX15.720.12
+0.77%
Fidelity Infrastructure
BRUHX16.610.09
+0.54%
MFS Blended Research Value Equity I
MGICX35.890.13
+0.36%
MFS International Intrinsic Value C
GSUKX20.750.05
+0.24%
Goldman Sachs International Eq Inc R6

ACOPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACOPY and ACOPF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACOPY and ACOPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACOPY
1D Price
Change %
ACOPY100%
+0.10%
ACOPF - ACOPY
25%
Poorly correlated
-9.14%
AJINF - ACOPY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PAVS - ACOPY
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
FAMI - ACOPY
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.39%
UTZ - ACOPY
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
More

UTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UTZ has been loosely correlated with KHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UTZ jumps, then KHC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UTZ
1D Price
Change %
UTZ100%
-0.30%
KHC - UTZ
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.48%
FLO - UTZ
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
CPB - UTZ
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
CAG - UTZ
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
GIS - UTZ
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
More