Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACRIX vs FLDFX
ACRIX vs FLDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. FLDFX commentary
Nov 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a StrongBuy and FLDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. FLDFX (436M). FLDFX pays higher dividends than ACRIX: FLDFX (1.06) vs ACRIX (0.48). ACRIX was incepted earlier than FLDFX: ACRIX (9 years) vs FLDFX (20 years). FLDFX (1.50) is less costly to investors than ACRIX (1.18). FLDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 247.00 vs. ACRIX (66.00). FLDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: FLDFX (2500) vs ACRIX (10000000). ACRIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.82 vs. FLDFX (-2.93). ACRIX return over 5 years is better than : 26.51 vs. FLDFX (19.34).
| ACRIX | FLDFX | ACRIX / FLDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.50 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.50 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.950 | 11.997 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2500 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 436M | 320% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 1.06 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.82 | -2.93 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.49 | 21.86 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.51 | 19.34 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 46.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement