Ad is loading...
ACRIX vs FLDFX
ACRIX vs FLDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. FLDFX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a Hold and FLDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. FLDFX (383M). FLDFX pays higher dividends than ACRIX: FLDFX (1.33) vs ACRIX (0.55). ACRIX was incepted earlier than FLDFX: ACRIX (9 years) vs FLDFX (19 years). FLDFX (1.49) is less costly to investors than ACRIX (1.22). FLDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 273.00 vs. ACRIX (66.00). FLDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: FLDFX (2500) vs ACRIX (10000000). ACRIX (-11.00) and FLDFX (-11.15) have marching annual gain over last year. ACRIX return over 5 years is better than : 24.92 vs. FLDFX (16.07).
| ACRIX | FLDFX | ACRIX / FLDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.49 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.49 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.465 | -6.097 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2500 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.2B | 383M | 312% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.33 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.00 | -11.15 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.88 | -2.08 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.92 | 16.07 | 155% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 17.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers