Ad is loading...
ACRIX vs FLDFX
ACRIX vs FLDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. FLDFX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a Buy and FLDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.34B vs. FLDFX (418M). FLDFX pays higher dividends than ACRIX: FLDFX (1.47) vs ACRIX (0.86). ACRIX was incepted earlier than FLDFX: ACRIX (8 years) vs FLDFX (19 years). FLDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 273.00 vs. ACRIX (176.00). FLDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: FLDFX (2500) vs ACRIX (10000000). ACRIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.22 vs. FLDFX (-1.81). ACRIX return over 5 years is better than : 16.58 vs. FLDFX (9.23).
| ACRIX | FLDFX | ACRIX / FLDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.402 | 2.002 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2500 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 418M | 321% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.47 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.22 | -1.81 | -123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.60 | 5.11 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.58 | 9.23 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 26.96 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers