Ad is loading...
ACRIX vs FLDFX
ACRIX vs FLDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. FLDFX commentary
Dec 25, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a Hold and FLDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.32B vs. FLDFX (410M). FLDFX pays higher dividends than ACRIX: FLDFX (1.47) vs ACRIX (0.86). ACRIX was incepted earlier than FLDFX: ACRIX (8 years) vs FLDFX (19 years). FLDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 273.00 vs. ACRIX (176.00). FLDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: FLDFX (2500) vs ACRIX (10000000). ACRIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.55 vs. FLDFX (1.24). ACRIX return over 5 years is better than : 16.25 vs. FLDFX (10.29).
| ACRIX | FLDFX | ACRIX / FLDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.012 | 0.929 | 540% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2500 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 410M | 322% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.47 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.55 | 1.24 | 447% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.07 | -7.20 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.25 | 10.29 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 27.43 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers