Ad is loading...
ACRIX vs FLDFX
ACRIX vs FLDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. FLDFX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a Buy and FLDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.27B vs. FLDFX (399M). FLDFX pays higher dividends than ACRIX: FLDFX (1.34) vs ACRIX (0.56). ACRIX was incepted earlier than FLDFX: ACRIX (9 years) vs FLDFX (19 years). FLDFX (1.50) is less costly to investors than ACRIX (1.18). FLDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 247.00 vs. ACRIX (66.00). FLDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: FLDFX (2500) vs ACRIX (10000000). ACRIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.03 vs. FLDFX (-7.95). ACRIX return over 5 years is better than : 33.50 vs. FLDFX (20.66).
| ACRIX | FLDFX | ACRIX / FLDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.50 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.50 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.656 | -1.843 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2500 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 399M | 319% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 1.34 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.03 | -7.95 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.56 | 5.71 | 185% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.50 | 20.66 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 22.50 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers