Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACRIX vs FLDFX
ACRIX vs FLDFX Comparison
Open Charts ACRIX vs FLDFX
ACRIX vs FLDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. FLDFX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a Hold and FLDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.53B vs. FLDFX (486M). FLDFX pays higher dividends than ACRIX: FLDFX (0.89) vs ACRIX (0.67). ACRIX was incepted earlier than FLDFX: ACRIX (10 years) vs FLDFX (20 years). FLDFX (1.47) is less costly to investors than ACRIX (1.15). FLDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 243.00 vs. ACRIX (172.00). FLDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: FLDFX (2500) vs ACRIX (10000000). FLDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.29 vs. ACRIX (6.20). FLDFX return over 5 years is better than : 10.67 vs. ACRIX (8.49).
| ACRIX | FLDFX | ACRIX / FLDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.47 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.47 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.059 | 7.440 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2500 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.53B | 486M | 314% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.89 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.20 | 12.29 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.47 | 22.10 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.49 | 10.67 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 52.05 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement