Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACRIX vs FLDFX
ACRIX vs FLDFX Comparison
Open Charts ACRIX vs FLDFX
ACRIX vs FLDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. FLDFX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a Buy and FLDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.57B vs. FLDFX (487M). FLDFX pays higher dividends than ACRIX: FLDFX (0.85) vs ACRIX (0.67). ACRIX was incepted earlier than FLDFX: ACRIX (10 years) vs FLDFX (20 years). FLDFX (1.47) is less costly to investors than ACRIX (1.15). FLDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 243.00 vs. ACRIX (172.00). FLDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: FLDFX (2500) vs ACRIX (10000000). FLDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.48 vs. ACRIX (12.48). FLDFX (11.97) and ACRIX (11.82) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ACRIX | FLDFX | ACRIX / FLDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.47 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.47 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.925 | 7.699 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2500 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.57B | 487M | 322% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.85 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.48 | 15.48 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.46 | 25.66 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.82 | 11.97 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 57.87 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement