Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACRIX vs FLDFX
ACRIX vs FLDFX Comparison
Open Charts ACRIX vs FLDFX
ACRIX vs FLDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. FLDFX commentary
Sep 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a Buy and FLDFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.61B vs. FLDFX (505M). FLDFX pays higher dividends than ACRIX: FLDFX (0.87) vs ACRIX (0.66). ACRIX was incepted earlier than FLDFX: ACRIX (10 years) vs FLDFX (21 years). FLDFX (1.47) is less costly to investors than ACRIX (1.15). FLDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 243.00 vs. ACRIX (172.00). FLDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: FLDFX (2500) vs ACRIX (10000000). FLDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.67 vs. ACRIX (10.57). FLDFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.05 vs. ACRIX (11.15).
| ACRIX | FLDFX | ACRIX / FLDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.47 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.47 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.815 | 10.705 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2500 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.61B | 505M | 318% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.87 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.57 | 12.67 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.30 | 27.26 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.15 | 12.05 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement