Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACRIX vs FLMAX
ACRIX vs FLMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. FLMAX commentary
Nov 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a Hold and FLMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.35B vs. FLMAX (1.05B). FLMAX pays higher dividends than ACRIX: FLMAX (1.04) vs ACRIX (0.48). ACRIX was incepted earlier than FLMAX: ACRIX (9 years) vs FLMAX (9 years). ACRIX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FLMAX (0.91). FLMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 312.00 vs. ACRIX (66.00). FLMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: FLMAX (2500) vs ACRIX (10000000). ACRIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.16 vs. FLMAX (-6.37). FLMAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.72 vs. ACRIX (25.62).
| ACRIX | FLMAX | ACRIX / FLMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.91 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.91 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.548 | 9.708 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2500 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.35B | 1.05B | 129% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 1.04 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.16 | -6.37 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.81 | 22.29 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.62 | 37.72 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement