Ad is loading...
ACRIX vs FLMAX
ACRIX vs FLMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. FLMAX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a Buy and FLMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.36B vs. FLMAX (984M). FLMAX pays higher dividends than ACRIX: FLMAX (1.72) vs ACRIX (0.86). ACRIX was incepted earlier than FLMAX: ACRIX (8 years) vs FLMAX (8 years). FLMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 316.00 vs. ACRIX (176.00). FLMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: FLMAX (2500) vs ACRIX (10000000). ACRIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.82 vs. FLMAX (0.50). FLMAX return over 5 years is better than : 26.40 vs. ACRIX (18.41).
| ACRIX | FLMAX | ACRIX / FLMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.021 | 4.189 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2500 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.36B | 984M | 138% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.72 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.82 | 0.50 | 763% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.33 | 11.90 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.41 | 26.40 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers