Ad is loading...
ACRIX vs FLMAX
ACRIX vs FLMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. FLMAX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a StrongBuy and FLMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.27B vs. FLMAX (929M). FLMAX pays higher dividends than ACRIX: FLMAX (1.30) vs ACRIX (0.55). ACRIX was incepted earlier than FLMAX: ACRIX (9 years) vs FLMAX (8 years). ACRIX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FLMAX (0.94). FLMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 316.00 vs. ACRIX (66.00). FLMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: FLMAX (2500) vs ACRIX (10000000). ACRIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.38 vs. FLMAX (-9.60). FLMAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.75 vs. ACRIX (35.88).
| ACRIX | FLMAX | ACRIX / FLMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.94 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.94 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.577 | -3.225 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2500 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 929M | 137% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.30 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.38 | -9.60 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.30 | 2.01 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.88 | 47.75 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers