Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACRIX vs FLMAX
ACRIX vs FLMAX Comparison
Open Charts ACRIX vs FLMAX
ACRIX vs FLMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. FLMAX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a Hold and FLMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.53B vs. FLMAX (1.28B). FLMAX pays higher dividends than ACRIX: FLMAX (0.92) vs ACRIX (0.67). ACRIX was incepted earlier than FLMAX: ACRIX (10 years) vs FLMAX (10 years). ACRIX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FLMAX (0.97). FLMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 307.00 vs. ACRIX (172.00). FLMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: FLMAX (2500) vs ACRIX (10000000). FLMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.52 vs. ACRIX (6.43). FLMAX return over 5 years is better than : 24.30 vs. ACRIX (8.73).
| ACRIX | FLMAX | ACRIX / FLMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.97 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.97 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.297 | 9.961 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2500 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.53B | 1.28B | 119% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.92 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.43 | 14.52 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.74 | 26.00 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.73 | 24.30 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement