Ad is loading...
ACRIX vs UPAAX
ACRIX vs UPAAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. UPAAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a Buy and UPAAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. UPAAX (1.83M). ACRIX pays higher dividends than UPAAX: ACRIX (0.55) vs UPAAX (0.00). ACRIX was incepted earlier than UPAAX: ACRIX (9 years) vs UPAAX (8 years). UPAAX (3.28) is less costly to investors than ACRIX (1.22). ACRIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. UPAAX (0.00). UPAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: UPAAX (2000) vs ACRIX (10000000). ACRIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.73 vs. UPAAX (-10.18). UPAAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.76 vs. ACRIX (26.17).
| ACRIX | UPAAX | ACRIX / UPAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 3.28 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 3.28 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.344 | -26.286 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2000 | 500,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.22B | 1.83M | 66,849% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.73 | -10.18 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.26 | -13.24 | -10% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.17 | 47.76 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...