Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACRIX vs UPAAX
ACRIX vs UPAAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. UPAAX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a Buy and UPAAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. UPAAX (2.31M). ACRIX pays higher dividends than UPAAX: ACRIX (0.56) vs UPAAX (0.00). ACRIX was incepted earlier than UPAAX: ACRIX (9 years) vs UPAAX (8 years). UPAAX (3.28) is less costly to investors than ACRIX (1.18). ACRIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. UPAAX (0.00). UPAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: UPAAX (2000) vs ACRIX (10000000). UPAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.31 vs. ACRIX (-4.83). UPAAX return over 5 years is better than : 83.46 vs. ACRIX (36.32).
| ACRIX | UPAAX | ACRIX / UPAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 3.28 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 3.28 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -6.786 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2000 | 500,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 2.31M | 56,537% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.83 | 0.31 | -1,572% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.79 | 16.20 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.32 | 83.46 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement