Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACSHX vs RMEBX
ACSHX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts ACSHX vs RMEBX
ACSHX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACSHX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACSHX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. ACSHX (14.7B). ACSHX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: ACSHX (1.68) vs RMEBX (1.04). ACSHX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: ACSHX (16 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than ACSHX (0.51). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. ACSHX (26.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACSHX: RMEBX (250) vs ACSHX (1000000). ACSHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.17 vs. RMEBX (9.11). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.74 vs. ACSHX (25.40).
| ACSHX | RMEBX | ACSHX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.07 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.07 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.057 | 6.308 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.7B | 117B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 1.04 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.17 | 9.11 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.88 | 34.37 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.40 | 34.74 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.72 | 94.33 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement