Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACSHX vs RMFCX
ACSHX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ACSHX vs RMFCX
ACSHX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACSHX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACSHX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. ACSHX (14.5B). ACSHX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: ACSHX (1.68) vs RMFCX (1.19). ACSHX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ACSHX (16 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than ACSHX (0.51). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. ACSHX (26.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACSHX: RMFCX (250) vs ACSHX (1000000). ACSHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.82 vs. RMFCX (10.10). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.85 vs. ACSHX (18.84).
| ACSHX | RMFCX | ACSHX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.91 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.91 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.781 | 5.845 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.5B | 115B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 1.19 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.82 | 10.10 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.31 | 34.65 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.84 | 33.85 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.70 | 91.46 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement