Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACSLX vs GFACX
ACSLX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts ACSLX vs GFACX
ACSLX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACSLX vs. GFACX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACSLX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. ACSLX (6.16B). ACSLX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . ACSLX was incepted earlier than GFACX: ACSLX (24 years) vs GFACX (26 years). ACSLX (1.98) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. ACSLX (22.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACSLX: GFACX (250) vs ACSLX (2500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.39 vs. ACSLX (-6.50). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 3.85 vs. ACSLX (-5.57).
| ACSLX | GFACX | ACSLX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 1.35 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.35 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.024 | 8.529 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.16B | 353B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.50 | -2.39 | 272% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.94 | 34.46 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.57 | 3.85 | -145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.99 | 82.33 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement