Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACSLX vs RGAGX
ACSLX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts ACSLX vs RGAGX
ACSLX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACSLX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACSLX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. ACSLX (6.16B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than ACSLX: RGAGX (0.51) vs ACSLX (0.00). ACSLX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: ACSLX (24 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). ACSLX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. ACSLX (22.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACSLX: RGAGX (250) vs ACSLX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.49 vs. ACSLX (-6.50). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 15.00 vs. ACSLX (-5.57).
| ACSLX | RGAGX | ACSLX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.29 | 655% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.29 | 683% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.024 | 9.321 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.16B | 353B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.50 | 0.49 | -1,328% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.94 | 44.65 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.57 | 15.00 | -37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.99 | 110.30 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers