Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACSRX vs RMEBX
ACSRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts ACSRX vs RMEBX
ACSRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACSRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACSRX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. ACSRX (15.2B). ACSRX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: ACSRX (1.17) vs RMEBX (0.99). ACSRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: ACSRX (24 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) and ACSRX (1.05) have similar cost to investors . ACSRX (31.00) and RMEBX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACSRX: RMEBX (250) vs ACSRX (1000). ACSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. RMEBX (9.03). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.75 vs. ACSRX (27.02).
| ACSRX | RMEBX | ACSRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.07 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.07 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.903 | 10.367 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.2B | 118B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.99 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | 9.03 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.31 | 38.30 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.02 | 35.75 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.38 | 90.55 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement