Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACSRX vs RMEBX
ACSRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts ACSRX vs RMEBX
ACSRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACSRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACSRX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. ACSRX (14.5B). ACSRX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: ACSRX (1.20) vs RMEBX (1.04). ACSRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: ACSRX (24 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) and ACSRX (1.05) have similar cost to investors . RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. ACSRX (26.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACSRX: RMEBX (250) vs ACSRX (1000). ACSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.25 vs. RMEBX (9.98). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.93 vs. ACSRX (15.77).
| ACSRX | RMEBX | ACSRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.07 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.07 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.537 | 5.801 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.5B | 115B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.04 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.25 | 9.98 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.26 | 34.14 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.77 | 32.93 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.65 | 89.84 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement