Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACSRX vs RMFCX
ACSRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ACSRX vs RMFCX
ACSRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACSRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACSRX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. ACSRX (15.2B). ACSRX (1.17) and RMFCX (1.15) have matching dividends . ACSRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ACSRX (24 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). ACSRX (1.05) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). ACSRX (31.00) and RMFCX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACSRX: RMFCX (250) vs ACSRX (1000). ACSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. RMFCX (9.14). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. ACSRX (27.02).
| ACSRX | RMFCX | ACSRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.91 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.91 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.903 | 10.454 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.2B | 118B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.15 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | 9.14 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.31 | 38.82 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.02 | 36.70 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.38 | 92.27 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement