Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACSRX vs RMFCX
ACSRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ACSRX vs RMFCX
ACSRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACSRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACSRX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. ACSRX (14.5B). ACSRX (1.20) and RMFCX (1.19) have matching dividends . ACSRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ACSRX (24 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). ACSRX (1.05) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. ACSRX (26.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACSRX: RMFCX (250) vs ACSRX (1000). ACSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.25 vs. RMFCX (10.31). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.04 vs. ACSRX (15.77).
| ACSRX | RMFCX | ACSRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.91 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.91 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.537 | 6.510 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.5B | 115B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.19 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.25 | 10.31 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.26 | 35.49 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.77 | 34.04 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.65 | 92.67 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers