ACU
Price
$44.36
Change
-$0.07 (-0.16%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
168.53M
50 days until earnings call
SKIN
Price
$2.05
Change
+$0.04 (+1.99%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
259.99M
64 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACU vs SKIN

Header iconACU vs SKIN Comparison
Open Charts ACU vs SKINBanner chart's image
Acme United
Price$44.36
Change-$0.07 (-0.16%)
Volume$11.51K
Capitalization168.53M
Beauty Health Company (The)
Price$2.05
Change+$0.04 (+1.99%)
Volume$1.11M
Capitalization259.99M
ACU vs SKIN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SKIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACU vs. SKIN commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACU is a Hold and SKIN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (ACU: $44.36 vs. SKIN: $2.05)
Brand notoriety: ACU and SKIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACU: 112% vs. SKIN: 107%
Market capitalization -- ACU: $168.53M vs. SKIN: $259.99M
ACU [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $168.53M. SKIN’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $259.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $374.83B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $22.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSKIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SKIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACU is a better buy in the long-term than SKIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACU’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SKIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SKIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ACU is a better buy in the short-term than SKIN.

Price Growth

ACU (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +3.11% price change this week, while SKIN (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -1.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACU is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

SKIN is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+0.48% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SKIN($260M) has a higher market cap than ACU($169M). SKIN YTD gains are higher at: 28.931 vs. ACU (20.213). SKIN (20.7M) and ACU (20.5M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . SKIN has more cash in the bank: 212M vs. ACU (3.64M). ACU has less debt than SKIN: ACU (34.2M) vs SKIN (377M). SKIN has higher revenues than ACU: SKIN (310M) vs ACU (194M).
ACUSKINACU / SKIN
Capitalization169M260M65%
EBITDA20.5M20.7M99%
Gain YTD20.21328.93170%
P/E Ratio17.40N/A-
Revenue194M310M63%
Total Cash3.64M212M2%
Total Debt34.2M377M9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACU: Fundamental Ratings
ACU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
45
SMR RATING
1..100
72
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
42

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACUSKIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SKIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CYVF68.00N/A
N/A
Crystal Valley Financial Corp.
DSKIF24.00N/A
N/A
Daiseki Co., Ltd.
JPSTF12.77N/A
N/A
JAPAN POST BK CO LTD
STHRF27.76-0.34
-1.22%
STRATHCONA RES LTD.
HAYAF0.13-0.01
-4.82%
Hayasa Metals Inc.

SKIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SKIN has been loosely correlated with RPHCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SKIN jumps, then RPHCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SKIN
1D Price
Change %
SKIN100%
+1.99%
RPHCF - SKIN
63%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HNST - SKIN
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
NUS - SKIN
32%
Poorly correlated
-6.59%
COTY - SKIN
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
EL - SKIN
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.99%
More