Advertisement
NUS vs SKIN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NUS is a Hold and SKIN is a Hold.
NUS | SKIN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 7 Undervalued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 81 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 40 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NUS's Valuation (7) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is significantly better than the same rating for SKIN (78) in the null industry. This means that NUS’s stock grew significantly faster than SKIN’s over the last 12 months.
NUS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as SKIN (100) in the null industry. This means that NUS’s stock grew similarly to SKIN’s over the last 12 months.
NUS's SMR Rating (97) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as SKIN (98) in the null industry. This means that NUS’s stock grew similarly to SKIN’s over the last 12 months.
NUS's Price Growth Rating (79) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as SKIN (81) in the null industry. This means that NUS’s stock grew similarly to SKIN’s over the last 12 months.
SKIN's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NUS (48) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that SKIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than NUS’s over the last 12 months.
| NUS | SKIN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 66% | 19 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 88% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NUS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while SKIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- NUS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SKIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NUS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SKIN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NUS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SKIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
NUS (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -1.52% price change this week, while SKIN (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -4.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -2.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.83%.
Reported Earning Dates
NUS is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
SKIN is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (-2.95% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ABCS | 33.41 | 0.15 | +0.46% |
| Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) | |||
| DEED | 20.31 | 0.04 | +0.20% |
| First Trust Securitized Plus ETF (DEED) | |||
| SPIB | 32.23 | -0.05 | -0.15% |
| State Street SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) | |||
| SBND | 18.25 | -0.04 | -0.22% |
| Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF (SBND) | |||
| IBHF | 22.46 | -0.07 | -0.31% |
| iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHF) | |||
NUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NUS has been loosely correlated with SPB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NUS jumps, then SPB could also see price increases.
SKIN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SKIN and COTY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SKIN and COTY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SKIN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SKIN | 100% | N/A | ||
| COTY - SKIN | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.53% | ||
| HNST - SKIN | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.14% | ||
| HIMS - SKIN | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.64% | ||
| NUS - SKIN | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.44% | ||
| ACU - SKIN | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.43% | ||
More | ||||