Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACUIX vs RMEBX
ACUIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts ACUIX vs RMEBX
ACUIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACUIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACUIX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. ACUIX (2.63B). ACUIX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: ACUIX (1.55) vs RMEBX (0.99). ACUIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: ACUIX (26 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). ACUIX (1.78) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). ACUIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACUIX: RMEBX (250) vs ACUIX (2000). ACUIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.98 vs. RMEBX (9.97). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 37.16 vs. ACUIX (28.65).
| ACUIX | RMEBX | ACUIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 1.07 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 1.07 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.115 | 11.878 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.63B | 118B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.55 | 0.99 | 157% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.98 | 9.97 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.25 | 37.14 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.65 | 37.16 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.52 | 92.64 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement