ACVA
Price
$15.72
Change
+$0.33 (+2.14%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
3.08B
50 days until earnings call
FHNGY
Price
$7.09
Change
+$0.20 (+2.90%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
2.24B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACVA vs FHNGY

Header iconACVA vs FHNGY Comparison
Open Charts ACVA vs FHNGYBanner chart's image
ACV Auctions
Price$15.72
Change+$0.33 (+2.14%)
Volume$1.77M
Capitalization3.08B
Foschini Group Ltd. (The)
Price$7.09
Change+$0.20 (+2.90%)
Volume$2.1K
Capitalization2.24B
ACVA vs FHNGY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACVA vs. FHNGY commentary
Jun 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACVA is a StrongBuy and FHNGY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 17, 2025
Stock price -- (ACVA: $15.72 vs. FHNGY: $7.09)
Brand notoriety: ACVA and FHNGY are both not notable
ACVA represents the Specialty Stores, while FHNGY is part of the Department Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACVA: 99% vs. FHNGY: 108%
Market capitalization -- ACVA: $3.08B vs. FHNGY: $2.24B
ACVA [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $3.08B. FHNGY’s [@Department Stores] market capitalization is $2.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Department Stores] industry ranges from $12.34T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.34B. The average market capitalization across the [@Department Stores] industry is $5.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACVA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFHNGY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ACVA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FHNGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHNGY is a better buy in the long-term than ACVA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACVA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ACVA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ACVA (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -5.81% price change this week, while FHNGY (@Department Stores) price change was -5.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.30%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Department Stores industry was +1.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACVA is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-0.96% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

@Department Stores (+1.60% weekly)

A department store sells a wide variety of consumer goods under different “departments,” including (but not necessarily limited to) apparel, household appliances, home furnishings, personal care products, cosmetics, consumer electronics. During healthy macroeconomic conditions, consumers typically won’t shy away from big-ticket purchases; but during a downturn, consumer spending might get limited to the most necessary/daily essentials. Several department stores purchase items on bulk from manufacturers for resale to consumers at a profit. Some of the largest department stores companies in the U.S. include Kohl’s Corporation, Macy’s Inc., and Ollie’s Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACVA($3.08B) has a higher market cap than FHNGY($2.24B). FHNGY YTD gains are higher at: -18.967 vs. ACVA (-27.222). FHNGY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.2B vs. ACVA (-53.89M). FHNGY has more cash in the bank: 3.23B vs. ACVA (411M). ACVA has less debt than FHNGY: ACVA (115M) vs FHNGY (23.4B). FHNGY has higher revenues than ACVA: FHNGY (58.3B) vs ACVA (481M).
ACVAFHNGYACVA / FHNGY
Capitalization3.08B2.24B138%
EBITDA-53.89M12.2B-0%
Gain YTD-27.222-18.967144%
P/E RatioN/A13.08-
Revenue481M58.3B1%
Total Cash411M3.23B13%
Total Debt115M23.4B0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACVA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RIDGX26.340.06
+0.23%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R6
GSGCX43.85N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Equity Income C
DPRCX12.77N/A
N/A
Macquarie Global Listed Real Assets C
CIPIX23.85N/A
N/A
Champlain Mid Cap Institutional
CSHAX11.38-0.11
-0.96%
NYLI Cushing® MLP Premier Class A

ACVA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACVA has been loosely correlated with AN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACVA jumps, then AN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACVA
1D Price
Change %
ACVA100%
+2.14%
AN - ACVA
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.80%
CVNA - ACVA
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.35%
RUSHB - ACVA
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
ABG - ACVA
54%
Loosely correlated
+3.22%
CPRT - ACVA
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
More

FHNGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FHNGY and WCRS have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FHNGY and WCRS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FHNGY
1D Price
Change %
FHNGY100%
+2.98%
WCRS - FHNGY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DUFRY - FHNGY
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
KIRK - FHNGY
20%
Poorly correlated
+6.72%
ACVA - FHNGY
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.14%
BARK - FHNGY
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.18%
More