ACVA
Price
$10.41
Change
+$3.19 (+44.18%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
1.77B
59 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KMX
Price
$61.32
Change
+$0.80 (+1.32%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
8.7B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACVA vs KMX

ACVA vs KMX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACVA vs. KMX commentary
Sep 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACVA is a Hold and KMX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KMX($8.7B) has a higher market cap than ACVA($1.77B). KMX YTD gains are higher at: 58.696 vs. ACVA (29.800). KMX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.59B vs. ACVA (-3.35M). ACVA has more cash in the bank: 242M vs. KMX (132M). ACVA has less debt than KMX: ACVA (205M) vs KMX (18.6B). KMX has higher revenues than ACVA: KMX (26.3B) vs ACVA (801M).
ACVAKMXACVA / KMX
Capitalization1.77B8.7B20%
EBITDA-3.35M1.59B-0%
Gain YTD29.80058.69651%
P/E RatioN/A38.09-
Revenue801M26.3B3%
Total Cash242M132M183%
Total Debt205M18.6B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KMX: Fundamental Ratings
KMX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
91
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
86
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
19
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
18

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACVAKMX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 14, 2026
Stock price -- (ACVA: $10.41 vs. KMX: $61.32)
Brand notoriety: ACVA and KMX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACVA: 1754% vs. KMX: 64%
Market capitalization -- ACVA: $1.77B vs. KMX: $8.7B
ACVA [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $1.77B. KMX’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $8.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $15.95K to $76.11B. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $5.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACVA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while KMX’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ACVA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KMX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, KMX is a better buy in the long-term than ACVA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACVA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KMX’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACVA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KMX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ACVA is a better buy in the short-term than KMX.

Price Growth

ACVA (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а +49.14% price change this week, while KMX (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was -3.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -6.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACVA is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

KMX is expected to report earnings on Sep 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (-6.57% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

View a ticker or compare two or three
ACVA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KMX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SFL13.180.50
+3.94%
SFL Corp Ltd
NIO3.690.11
+3.07%
NIO Inc.
BPYPP15.82-0.05
-0.28%
Brookfield Property Partners LP
EYPT4.23-0.02
-0.47%
EyePoint Inc.
DSWL3.01-0.13
-4.14%
Deswell Industries

ACVA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACVA has been loosely correlated with CPRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACVA jumps, then CPRT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACVA
1D Price
Change %
ACVA100%
+44.18%
CPRT - ACVA
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.60%
HZO - ACVA
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
KMX - ACVA
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
HNST - ACVA
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.88%
RH - ACVA
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
More

KMX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KMX has been loosely correlated with CPRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KMX jumps, then CPRT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMX
1D Price
Change %
KMX100%
+1.32%
CPRT - KMX
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.60%
FND - KMX
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
HZO - KMX
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
HNST - KMX
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.88%
RH - KMX
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
More