ACVA vs RUSHB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACVA is a Hold and RUSHB is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACVA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHB’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- ACVA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- RUSHB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACVA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ACVA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- RUSHB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ACVA (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +7.83% price change this week, while RUSHB (@Specialty Stores) price change was -2.50% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.25%.
Reported Earning Dates
ACVA is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.
RUSHB is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (-0.50% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
| ACVA | RUSHB | ACVA / RUSHB | |
| Capitalization | 3.08B | 4.12B | 75% |
| EBITDA | -53.89M | 737M | -7% |
| Gain YTD | 44.488 | 3.668 | 1,213% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 12.65 | - |
| Revenue | 481M | 7.93B | 6% |
| Total Cash | 411M | 184M | 223% |
| Total Debt | 115M | 1.81B | 6% |
RUSHB | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ACVA | RUSHB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 10 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | N/A |
ACVA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACVA has been loosely correlated with CPRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACVA jumps, then CPRT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACVA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACVA | 100% | +4.54% | ||
| CPRT - ACVA | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| HNST - ACVA | 46% Loosely correlated | +4.71% | ||
| PAG - ACVA | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| RUSHB - ACVA | 44% Loosely correlated | +2.17% | ||
| AN - ACVA | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
More | ||||
RUSHB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHB has been closely correlated with RUSHA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHB jumps, then RUSHA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUSHB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHB | 100% | +2.17% | ||
| RUSHA - RUSHB | 89% Closely correlated | -1.67% | ||
| LAD - RUSHB | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| ABG - RUSHB | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| PAG - RUSHB | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| AN - RUSHB | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
More | ||||