ACVA
Price
$11.72
Change
+$0.03 (+0.26%)
Updated
Aug 29, 03:47 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.12B
68 days until earnings call
RUSHB
Price
$57.75
Change
-$0.97 (-1.65%)
Updated
Aug 29, 04:16 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.52B
60 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACVA vs RUSHB

Header iconACVA vs RUSHB Comparison
Open Charts ACVA vs RUSHBBanner chart's image
ACV Auctions
Price$11.72
Change+$0.03 (+0.26%)
Volume$400
Capitalization2.12B
Rush Enterprises
Price$57.75
Change-$0.97 (-1.65%)
Volume$568
Capitalization4.52B
ACVA vs RUSHB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACVA vs. RUSHB commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACVA is a StrongBuy and RUSHB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (ACVA: $11.69 vs. RUSHB: $58.72)
Brand notoriety: ACVA and RUSHB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACVA: 98% vs. RUSHB: 22%
Market capitalization -- ACVA: $2.12B vs. RUSHB: $4.52B
ACVA [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $2.12B. RUSHB’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $4.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $52.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $4.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACVA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACVA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RUSHB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHB is a better buy in the long-term than ACVA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACVA’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACVA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • RUSHB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ACVA is a better buy in the short-term than RUSHB.

Price Growth

ACVA (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а +1.92% price change this week, while RUSHB (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +5.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACVA is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

RUSHB is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (-0.68% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RUSHB($4.52B) has a higher market cap than ACVA($2.12B). RUSHB YTD gains are higher at: 8.945 vs. ACVA (-45.880). RUSHB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 682M vs. ACVA (-14.97M). ACVA has more cash in the bank: 305M vs. RUSHB (211M). ACVA has less debt than RUSHB: ACVA (186M) vs RUSHB (1.75B). RUSHB has higher revenues than ACVA: RUSHB (7.69B) vs ACVA (707M).
ACVARUSHBACVA / RUSHB
Capitalization2.12B4.52B47%
EBITDA-14.97M682M-2%
Gain YTD-45.8808.945-513%
P/E RatioN/A16.73-
Revenue707M7.69B9%
Total Cash305M211M145%
Total Debt186M1.75B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RUSHB: Fundamental Ratings
RUSHB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
78
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
11
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACVARUSHB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PABFX19.05N/A
N/A
PGIM Balanced Z
PSCZX25.49N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Small Company Z
VSGIX82.31N/A
N/A
Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index I
LVAGX16.94N/A
N/A
LSV Global Value Investor
FMKFX21.54N/A
N/A
Fidelity Magellan K6

ACVA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACVA has been loosely correlated with CPRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACVA jumps, then CPRT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACVA
1D Price
Change %
ACVA100%
+1.56%
CPRT - ACVA
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
CVNA - ACVA
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.73%
AN - ACVA
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
RUSHB - ACVA
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
HZO - ACVA
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.61%
More

RUSHB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHB has been closely correlated with RUSHA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHB jumps, then RUSHA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUSHB
1D Price
Change %
RUSHB100%
-0.81%
RUSHA - RUSHB
85%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
GPI - RUSHB
68%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
AN - RUSHB
67%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
ABG - RUSHB
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
PAG - RUSHB
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
More