Ad is loading...
ACVF vs JUST
ACVF vs JUST Comparison
Open Charts ACVF vs JUST
American Conservative Values ETF
Price$45.13
Change+$0.36 (+0.80%)
Volume$14.8K
Net Assets119.74M
Goldman Sachs JUST US Large Cap Eq ETF
Price$86.32
Change+$0.43 (+0.50%)
Volume$2.03K
Net Assets437.8M
ACVF vs JUST Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACVF vs. JUST commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACVF is a StrongBuy and JUST is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JUST has more net assets: 438M vs. ACVF (120M). JUST has a higher annual dividend yield than ACVF: JUST (3.827) vs ACVF (3.225). ACVF was incepted earlier than JUST: ACVF (4 years) vs JUST (7 years). ACVF (9.27) and JUST (9.00) have matching turnover.
| ACVF | JUST | ACVF / JUST | |
| Gain YTD | 3.225 | 3.827 | 84% |
| Net Assets | 120M | 438M | 27% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 9.27 | 9.00 | 103% |
| Yield | 0.71 | 1.24 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ACVF | JUST | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 84% | 26 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 72% | 5 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ACVF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACVF has been loosely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACVF jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACVF | 100% | +0.80% | ||
| SNPS - ACVF | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.66% | ||
| LRCX - ACVF | 61% Loosely correlated | +7.43% | ||
| CDNS - ACVF | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.72% | ||
| TROW - ACVF | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.38% | ||
| KLAC - ACVF | 60% Loosely correlated | +4.13% | ||
More | ||||