| ACWI | CZAR | ACWI / CZAR | |
| Gain YTD | 17.994 | 12.701 | 142% |
| Net Assets | 23.1B | 1.57M | 1,470,401% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.35 | 91% |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 113.00 | 3% |
| Yield | 1.43 | 0.84 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 2 years | - |
| ACWI | CZAR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 84% | 28 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 17 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KMID | 23.35 | -0.05 | -0.21% |
| Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF | |||
| GNR | 59.28 | -0.17 | -0.29% |
| SPDR® S&P Global Natural Resources ETF | |||
| HPS | 14.91 | -0.05 | -0.33% |
| John Hancock Preferred Income Fund III | |||
| FPRO | 22.17 | -0.17 | -0.74% |
| Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF | |||
| WEBL | 25.93 | -0.46 | -1.74% |
| Direxion Daily Dow Jones Int Bl 3X ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACWI has been loosely correlated with AAPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACWI jumps, then AAPL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACWI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWI | 100% | +0.14% | ||
| AAPL - ACWI | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| AVGO - ACWI | 57% Loosely correlated | +4.09% | ||
| MSFT - ACWI | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.35% | ||
| AMZN - ACWI | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| META - ACWI | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZAR has been loosely correlated with LIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CZAR jumps, then LIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZAR | 100% | N/A | ||
| LIN - CZAR | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| BLK - CZAR | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| FTV - CZAR | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| V - CZAR | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| CPAY - CZAR | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.35% | ||
More | ||||