Ad is loading...
ACWZX vs NRGEX
ACWZX vs NRGEX Comparison
Open Charts ACWZX vs NRGEX
AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Z
Price$16.72
Change+$0.27 (+1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.09M
Neuberger Berman Genesis E
Price$61.26
Change+$1.20 (+2.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.98B
ACWZX vs NRGEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGEX has more cash in the bank: 8.98B vs. ACWZX (33.1M). NRGEX pays higher dividends than ACWZX: NRGEX (0.58) vs ACWZX (0.00). ACWZX was incepted earlier than NRGEX: ACWZX (4 years) vs NRGEX (3 years). ACWZX (1.05) is less costly to investors than NRGEX (0.69). ACWZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. NRGEX (13.00). NRGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACWZX: NRGEX (0) vs ACWZX (5000000). ACWZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.18 vs. NRGEX (-5.23).
| ACWZX | NRGEX | ACWZX / NRGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.03 | 2,733% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.69 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.965 | -8.333 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.1M | 8.98B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.58 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.18 | -5.23 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.67 | 5.25 | 432% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...