Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ADANX vs WMNAX
ADANX vs WMNAX Comparison
Open Charts ADANX vs WMNAX
ADANX vs WMNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ADANX vs. WMNAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADANX is a Hold and WMNAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ADANX has more cash in the bank: 2.65B vs. WMNAX (170M). WMNAX pays higher dividends than ADANX: WMNAX (2.37) vs ADANX (1.80). ADANX was incepted earlier than WMNAX: ADANX (17 years) vs WMNAX (6 years). ADANX (2.05) is less costly to investors than WMNAX (1.21). ADANX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 410.00 vs. WMNAX (89.00). WMNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ADANX: WMNAX (1000) vs ADANX (2500). WMNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.49 vs. ADANX (6.20). WMNAX return over 5 years is better than : 24.22 vs. ADANX (14.20).
| ADANX | WMNAX | ADANX / WMNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.01 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.21 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.123 | 4.100 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.65B | 170M | 1,559% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 2.37 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.20 | 8.49 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.37 | 23.37 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.20 | 24.22 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.43 | N/A | - |