Ad is loading...
ADECX vs RMFCX
ADECX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ADECX vs RMFCX
Columbia Large Cap Value C
Price$16.08
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.36B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$54.99
Change-$0.12 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.86B
ADECX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ADECX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADECX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. ADECX (2.36B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than ADECX: RMFCX (1.37) vs ADECX (0.46). ADECX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ADECX (25 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). ADECX (1.74) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. ADECX (17.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ADECX: RMFCX (250) vs ADECX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.39 vs. ADECX (-2.03). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.82 vs. ADECX (43.67).
| ADECX | RMFCX | ADECX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.91 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.91 | 191% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.611 | 1.050 | -58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.36B | 101B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 1.37 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.03 | 4.39 | -46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.14 | 17.27 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.67 | 55.82 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.52 | 60.49 | 31% |