Ad is loading...
ADECX vs RMFCX
ADECX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ADECX vs RMFCX
Columbia Large Cap Value C
Price$15.23
Change+$0.13 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.23B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.51B
ADECX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ADECX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADECX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 96.5B vs. ADECX (2.23B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than ADECX: RMFCX (1.34) vs ADECX (0.45). ADECX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ADECX (25 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). ADECX (1.74) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. ADECX (17.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ADECX: RMFCX (250) vs ADECX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.60 vs. ADECX (-5.07). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 48.78 vs. ADECX (35.03).
| ADECX | RMFCX | ADECX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.91 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.91 | 191% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.668 | -3.342 | 200% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.23B | 96.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 1.34 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.07 | 3.60 | -141% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.42 | 5.79 | -145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.03 | 48.78 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.77 | 52.90 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...