Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ADECX vs RMFCX
ADECX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ADECX vs RMFCX
ADECX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ADECX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADECX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. ADECX (3.75B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than ADECX: RMFCX (1.15) vs ADECX (0.04). ADECX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ADECX (26 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). ADECX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). ADECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ADECX: RMFCX (250) vs ADECX (2000). ADECX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.20 vs. RMFCX (4.75). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.61 vs. ADECX (29.57).
| ADECX | RMFCX | ADECX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.91 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.91 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.090 | 8.539 | 224% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.75B | 117B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 1.15 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.20 | 4.75 | 362% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.59 | 35.38 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.57 | 35.61 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.78 | 94.16 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement