Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ADECX vs RMFCX
ADECX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ADECX vs RMFCX
ADECX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ADECX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADECX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. ADECX (3.54B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than ADECX: RMFCX (1.16) vs ADECX (0.05). ADECX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ADECX (26 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). ADECX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. ADECX (27.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ADECX: RMFCX (250) vs ADECX (2000). ADECX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.42 vs. RMFCX (8.88). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. ADECX (24.88).
| ADECX | RMFCX | ADECX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.91 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.91 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.983 | 9.137 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.54B | 118B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 1.16 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.42 | 8.88 | 219% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.49 | 34.84 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.88 | 37.23 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.08 | 91.06 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement