Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ADGCX vs RWMFX
ADGCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts ADGCX vs RWMFX
ADGCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ADGCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADGCX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. ADGCX (180M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than ADGCX: RWMFX (1.41) vs ADGCX (0.00). ADGCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: ADGCX (27 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). ADGCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. ADGCX (25.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ADGCX: RWMFX (250) vs ADGCX (2500). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.62 vs. ADGCX (-4.57). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.50 vs. ADGCX (-18.44).
| ADGCX | RWMFX | ADGCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.31 | 600% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.31 | 600% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.448 | 3.466 | 186% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 180M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.41 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.57 | 1.62 | -282% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.62 | 28.82 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.44 | 26.50 | -70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.79 | 80.90 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement