Investors seeking Asia-Pacific equity exposure often evaluate funds with complementary yet differentiated approaches to regional growth. Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV) and iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) do not compete directly but offer alternative strategies targeting similar investor goals of participating in Asia's economic expansion. ADIV focuses on dividend builders through active selection, while AIA delivers passive access to leading large-cap names. This comparison highlights their structural distinctions, exposure profiles, and positioning amid evolving regional dynamics.
The Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV) is an actively managed exchange-traded fund designed to provide exposure to high-quality dividend growers in the Asia-Pacific region. It does not track a specific index but follows a proprietary strategy emphasizing companies with sustainable dividend growth potential. The fund typically holds around 37 securities, allowing for concentrated positions in select issuers. Top holdings reflect a focus on dividend payers across countries such as Taiwan, South Korea, and others in the region. Sector allocations tend to balance technology, financials, and consumer-oriented industries. The expense ratio stands at 0.78%, reflecting active management costs. As a traditional exchange-traded fund structure, it offers daily liquidity and standard rebalancing driven by the adviser's ongoing security selection rather than mechanical index rules.
The iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the performance of the S&P Asia 50 Capped Index. This index comprises 50 of the largest equities from Hong Kong, South Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan. The ETF holds approximately 50 to 55 securities, with significant concentration in the top holdings such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing and Samsung Electronics. Sector allocations are dominated by information technology, followed by financials and consumer discretionary. The expense ratio is 0.50%, consistent with its passive, rules-based methodology. The fund employs market-capitalization weighting with capping constraints and rebalances periodically according to index methodology. Its exchange-traded structure supports high liquidity and transparent daily holdings disclosure.
The Asia-Pacific equity market encompasses dynamic economies driven by technology innovation, manufacturing strength, and expanding consumer bases. Key macroeconomic drivers include regional trade flows, monetary policy shifts in major Asian economies, and global supply-chain realignments. Capital flows into the region often respond to earnings cycles in technology and financial sectors, as well as broader interest-rate expectations. Regulatory developments around data security, cross-border investment, and corporate governance continue to shape the landscape. Sector risks encompass geopolitical tensions, currency fluctuations, and varying economic growth rates across individual markets. Both ETFs provide avenues to access these themes, though through differing lenses of active dividend focus versus broad large-cap representation.
In recent market cycles, the active dividend-selection approach of Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV) has positioned it to capture income-oriented opportunities amid sector rotations favoring stable payers. In contrast, the passive mega-cap tilt of iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) has aligned more closely with momentum in technology leaders during earnings expansion phases. Relative positioning reflects AIA's sensitivity to information-technology cycles and ADIV's emphasis on dividend consistency across broader sectors. Volatility differences arise from ADIV's concentrated active holdings versus AIA's diversified index construction, influencing behavior during macroeconomic shifts or commodity-related trends affecting the region.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors comparing ETFs like ADIV and AIA can leverage the tool to refine their analysis further.
Based on observable factors such as lower expense ratio, broader passive diversification, established index methodology, and scale, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of structural favorability to iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and large-cap regional exposure. Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV) may appeal in scenarios emphasizing active dividend growth selection. This assessment draws from structural strength, diversification profile, and risk exposure considerations without constituting investment advice.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| ADIV | AIA | ADIV / AIA | |
| Gain YTD | 8.012 | 54.571 | 15% |
| Net Assets | 55.8M | 5.44B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.50 | 156% |
| Turnover | 18.13 | 25.00 | 73% |
| Yield | 2.69 | 1.09 | 246% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 19 years | - |
| ADIV | AIA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 79% | 14 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XSHQ | 47.09 | 0.17 | +0.36% |
| Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF | |||
| DECU | 29.13 | -0.12 | -0.41% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 UncDecETF | |||
| VTP | 76.29 | -0.32 | -0.41% |
| Vanguard Total Inflation Protd Secs ETF | |||
| NUV | 9.12 | -0.04 | -0.44% |
| Nuveen Municipal Value Fund | |||
| OILD | 49.34 | -2.10 | -4.08% |
| MicroSectorsTM Ol&Gs E&P -3X Inv Lg ETNs | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ADIV has been loosely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ADIV jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ADIV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADIV | 100% | +0.21% | ||
| TSM - ADIV | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.20% | ||
| AVGO - ADIV | 50% Loosely correlated | -4.52% | ||
| QCOM - ADIV | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.86% | ||
| NTES - ADIV | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| AFL - ADIV | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.94% |