ADMLF
Price
$3.70
Change
+$0.06 (+1.65%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
650.73M
74 days until earnings call
GSCCF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
419.26M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ADMLF vs GSCCF

Header iconADMLF vs GSCCF Comparison
Open Charts ADMLF vs GSCCFBanner chart's image
Adriatic Metals
Price$3.70
Change+$0.06 (+1.65%)
Volume$2.1K
Capitalization650.73M
Ioneer
Price$0.07
Change+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Volume$15.25K
Capitalization419.26M
ADMLF vs GSCCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ADMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ADMLF vs. GSCCF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADMLF is a Hold and GSCCF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (ADMLF: $3.70 vs. GSCCF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: ADMLF and GSCCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ADMLF: 6% vs. GSCCF: 22%
Market capitalization -- ADMLF: $650.73M vs. GSCCF: $419.26M
ADMLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $650.73M. GSCCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $419.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ADMLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGSCCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ADMLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GSCCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ADMLF is a better buy in the long-term than GSCCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ADMLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSCCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ADMLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GSCCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GSCCF is a better buy in the short-term than ADMLF.

Price Growth

ADMLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +5.56% price change this week, while GSCCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -3.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

ADMLF is expected to report earnings on Sep 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ADMLF($651M) has a higher market cap than GSCCF($419M). ADMLF YTD gains are higher at: 49.798 vs. GSCCF (-26.619). GSCCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -9.59M vs. ADMLF (-16.12M). ADMLF has more cash in the bank: 83.4M vs. GSCCF (69.3M). GSCCF has less debt than ADMLF: GSCCF (300K) vs ADMLF (18.6M).
ADMLFGSCCFADMLF / GSCCF
Capitalization651M419M155%
EBITDA-16.12M-9.59M168%
Gain YTD49.798-26.619-187%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash83.4M69.3M120%
Total Debt18.6M300K6,200%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ADMLF vs GSCCF: Fundamental Ratings
ADMLF
GSCCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2122
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
27100
SMR RATING
1..100
9391
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3985
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10059
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ADMLF's Valuation (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSCCF (100). This means that ADMLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSCCF’s over the last 12 months.

ADMLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GSCCF (100). This means that ADMLF’s stock grew significantly faster than GSCCF’s over the last 12 months.

GSCCF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as ADMLF (93). This means that GSCCF’s stock grew similarly to ADMLF’s over the last 12 months.

ADMLF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSCCF (85). This means that ADMLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSCCF’s over the last 12 months.

GSCCF's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ADMLF (100). This means that GSCCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ADMLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ADMLFGSCCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
73%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ADMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LGLSX51.070.66
+1.31%
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R4
SCUIX30.310.20
+0.66%
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps I
FMPOX29.920.14
+0.47%
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value I
PDEZX19.080.04
+0.21%
PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Eq Opps Z
RYBCX59.980.01
+0.02%
Rydex Basic Materials C

ADMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ADMLF and LTSRF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ADMLF and LTSRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ADMLF
1D Price
Change %
ADMLF100%
+1.65%
LTSRF - ADMLF
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.08%
RIO - ADMLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
DYLLF - ADMLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
GLNCY - ADMLF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
IVPAF - ADMLF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.69%
More

GSCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GSCCF and IONR have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GSCCF and IONR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSCCF
1D Price
Change %
GSCCF100%
+11.54%
IONR - GSCCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADMLF - GSCCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.65%
GTCDF - GSCCF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRRLF - GSCCF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRLVF - GSCCF
5%
Poorly correlated
+9.09%
More