Advertisement
ADNT vs ALV
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Adient plc (ADNT) vs. Autoliv Inc. (ALV) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Adient plc (ADNT) and Autoliv Inc. (ALV) both operate in the auto parts sector, with ADNT focusing on seating systems and ALV on passive safety systems like airbags and seatbelts.
- ADNT shows stronger year-to-date gains at approximately 16%, outperforming ALV's 3% amid recent market volatility.
- ALV demonstrates superior profitability with a 6.45% profit margin and positive return on equity (ROE, a measure of profitability relative to shareholders' equity) of 28%, compared to ADNT's negative margins.
- Recent quarterly earnings beats for both, with ALV reporting 6.8% revenue growth and ADNT at 4.3%, highlighting resilience in automotive demand.
- ALV offers a 2.71% dividend yield and lower forward price-to-earnings (P/E, a valuation ratio comparing price to earnings) ratio of 5.89 versus ADNT's 9.97.
- Analyst upgrades, including Citigroup's Buy on ADNT and TD Cowen's raised target on ALV, signal positive sentiment shifts.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines ADNT and ALV, two key players in the cyclical auto parts industry. Both companies supply critical components to global automakers amid ongoing shifts toward electrification and safety enhancements. Traders seeking momentum plays may eye ADNT's recent outperformance, while value-oriented investors might prefer ALV's stability. In the current market environment, marked by volatile automotive production and economic uncertainty, understanding their relative performance, financial health, and sector exposure aids informed decision-making for portfolios focused on industrials and consumer cyclicals.
ADNT Overview and Recent Performance
Adient plc (ADNT), headquartered in Dublin, Ireland, specializes in seating systems for passenger cars, commercial vehicles, and light trucks. In recent market activity, the stock has traded around $22, with a market capitalization of about $1.77 billion and a 52-week range of $11.58 to $27.32. Year-to-date gains exceed 16%, reflecting resilience despite broader auto sector pressures. The first quarter of 2026 showed 4% revenue growth to approximately $3.6 billion (implied), adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) of $207 million, and raised full-year guidance, though GAAP losses persisted due to restructuring costs. Sentiment has improved with Citigroup's upgrade to Buy and a $33 price target, countering a post-earnings pullback, amid focus on cost efficiencies and FX tailwinds from Europe.
ALV Overview and Recent Performance
Autoliv Inc. (ALV), based in Stockholm, Sweden, leads in passive safety systems including airbags, seatbelts, and steering wheels for automotive and mobility applications. Shares recently hovered near $121, with a $9.09 billion market cap and 52-week range from $86 to $130. Year-to-date performance stands at 3%, with steadier momentum than peers in recent weeks. The latest quarterly results featured 6.8% sales growth to $2.75 billion and EPS of $2.05, surpassing estimates despite raw material pressures and FX headwinds. Positive analyst notes, like TD Cowen's Buy rating and $150 target, have bolstered confidence, driven by expanded product offerings and strong demand for safety features in vehicles.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available, each employing machine learning for real-time signals across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots target current market conditions like volatility in semiconductors and industrials, boasting annualized returns from 15% to 168%, win rates of 54% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7 over timeframes from 1 day to 55 days. Strategies vary by sector—such as multi-ticker plays in NVDA or gold miners—with drawdowns managed via customizable take-profit/stop-loss. Ideal for traders seeking data-driven edges without manual analysis, explore these bots to align with your risk profile and timeframe.
Head-to-Head Comparison
ADNT and ALV share auto parts exposure but diverge in focus: seating for ADNT versus safety systems for ALV, the latter benefiting from regulatory-driven demand. Growth drivers include production recovery for both, with ALV's 6.8% recent revenue edge over ADNT's 4.3%. Momentum favors ADNT YTD, but ALV exhibits trend consistency. Risks: ADNT's higher beta (1.56) and debt-to-equity (126%) signal volatility, while ALV (beta 1.36, 85% debt/equity) offers stability via dividends and margins. Market sentiment leans positive for both post-earnings, though ALV's larger scale provides trade-offs in valuation attractiveness.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward ALV based on superior trend consistency, profitability metrics like 28% ROE and 6.45% margins, recent earnings catalysts exceeding expectations, and relative positioning with a forward P/E under 6 alongside dividend support. While ADNT shows momentum potential, ALV's stability suits prevailing auto sector dynamics probabilistically better in the near term.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADNT is a Hold and ALV is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ADNT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileALV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ADNT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ALV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ADNT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ALV’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ADNT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- ALV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ADNT (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -9.85% price change this week, while ALV (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -5.92% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.83%.
Reported Earning Dates
ADNT is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
ALV is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.08% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
| ADNT | ALV | ADNT / ALV | |
| Capitalization | 1.62B | 8.86B | 18% |
| EBITDA | 780M | 1.48B | 53% |
| Gain YTD | 7.407 | 1.232 | 601% |
| P/E Ratio | 31.68 | 12.74 | 249% |
| Revenue | 14.9B | 11B | 135% |
| Total Cash | 831M | 342M | 243% |
| Total Debt | 2.39B | 2.25B | 106% |
ADNT | ALV | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 65 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 34 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 52 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ALV's Valuation (9) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ADNT (59). This means that ALV’s stock grew somewhat faster than ADNT’s over the last 12 months.
ALV's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ADNT (100). This means that ALV’s stock grew somewhat faster than ADNT’s over the last 12 months.
ALV's SMR Rating (34) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ADNT (89). This means that ALV’s stock grew somewhat faster than ADNT’s over the last 12 months.
ALV's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as ADNT (50). This means that ALV’s stock grew similarly to ADNT’s over the last 12 months.
ALV's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as ADNT (57). This means that ALV’s stock grew similarly to ADNT’s over the last 12 months.
| ADNT | ALV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 70% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 8 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 64% | 1 day ago 59% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XBTY | 5.88 | 0.09 | +1.47% |
| GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF | |||
| SPRE | 21.24 | 0.04 | +0.19% |
| SP Funds S&P Global REIT Sharia ETF | |||
| PMOC | 26.01 | N/A | N/A |
| PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - October | |||
| MBND | 27.28 | N/A | -0.01% |
| State Street® Nuveen Municipal Bond ETF | |||
| WINN | 32.15 | -0.52 | -1.59% |
| Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF | |||
ADNT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ADNT has been closely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ADNT jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ADNT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADNT | 100% | -0.77% | ||
| LEA - ADNT | 68% Closely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| ALV - ADNT | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| MGA - ADNT | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| THRM - ADNT | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| PHIN - ADNT | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||
ALV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALV has been closely correlated with THRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ALV jumps, then THRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ALV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALV | 100% | +0.08% | ||
| THRM - ALV | 67% Closely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| APTV - ALV | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| ADNT - ALV | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| PHIN - ALV | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| ALSN - ALV | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.70% | ||
More | ||||