Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEGFX vs FCPAX
AEGFX vs FCPAX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs FCPAX
AEGFX vs FCPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. FCPAX commentary
Jun 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Hold and FCPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. FCPAX (16.6B). AEGFX pays higher dividends than FCPAX: AEGFX (2.47) vs FCPAX (0.39). AEGFX was incepted earlier than FCPAX: AEGFX (25 years) vs FCPAX (29 years). FCPAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than AEGFX (0.86). FCPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. AEGFX (50.00). FCPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEGFX: FCPAX (0) vs AEGFX (250). FCPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.24 vs. AEGFX (10.51). FCPAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.35 vs. AEGFX (-5.68).
| AEGFX | FCPAX | AEGFX / FCPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.14 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.14 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.906 | 14.260 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 143B | 16.6B | 861% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.47 | 0.39 | 638% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.51 | 12.24 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.19 | 52.55 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.68 | 30.35 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.30 | 158.06 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers