Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEGFX vs FCPIX
AEGFX vs FCPIX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs FCPIX
AEGFX vs FCPIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. FCPIX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Buy and FCPIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. FCPIX (18.3B). AEGFX pays higher dividends than FCPIX: AEGFX (2.48) vs FCPIX (0.51). AEGFX was incepted earlier than FCPIX: AEGFX (26 years) vs FCPIX (29 years). FCPIX (0.89) and AEGFX (0.86) have similar cost to investors . FCPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. AEGFX (50.00). FCPIX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEGFX: FCPIX (0) vs AEGFX (250). AEGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.48 vs. FCPIX (2.91). FCPIX return over 5 years is better than : 18.08 vs. AEGFX (-4.67).
| AEGFX | FCPIX | AEGFX / FCPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.89 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.89 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.848 | 8.050 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140B | 18.3B | 765% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 0.51 | 487% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.48 | 2.91 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.19 | 47.89 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.67 | 18.08 | -26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.63 | 137.71 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers