Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEGFX vs HNCCX
AEGFX vs HNCCX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs HNCCX
American Funds EUPAC F1
Price$61.01
Change+$0.74 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.4B
Hartford International Growth C
Price$17.83
Change+$0.26 (+1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.15M
AEGFX vs HNCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. HNCCX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Hold and HNCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. HNCCX (331M). AEGFX pays higher dividends than HNCCX: AEGFX (0.68) vs HNCCX (0.00). AEGFX was incepted earlier than HNCCX: AEGFX (24 years) vs HNCCX (24 years). HNCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than AEGFX (0.86). AEGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. HNCCX (31.00). AEGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNCCX: AEGFX (250) vs HNCCX (2000). HNCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.76 vs. AEGFX (12.86). HNCCX return over 5 years is better than : 20.01 vs. AEGFX (11.82).
| AEGFX | HNCCX | AEGFX / HNCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 2.05 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 2.14 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.123 | 15.974 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 132B | 331M | 39,879% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.86 | 21.76 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.32 | 42.85 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.82 | 20.01 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.29 | 46.06 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement