Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEGFX vs HNCCX
AEGFX vs HNCCX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs HNCCX
American Funds EUPAC F1
Price$61.91
Change+$0.18 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.64B
Hartford International Growth C
Price$18.02
Change+$0.12 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.67M
AEGFX vs HNCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. HNCCX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Hold and HNCCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. HNCCX (339M). AEGFX pays higher dividends than HNCCX: AEGFX (0.68) vs HNCCX (0.00). AEGFX was incepted earlier than HNCCX: AEGFX (24 years) vs HNCCX (24 years). HNCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than AEGFX (0.86). AEGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. HNCCX (31.00). AEGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNCCX: AEGFX (250) vs HNCCX (2000). HNCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.52 vs. AEGFX (6.06). HNCCX return over 5 years is better than : 18.39 vs. AEGFX (9.35).
| AEGFX | HNCCX | AEGFX / HNCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 2.05 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 2.14 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.806 | 18.152 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 339M | 39,823% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.06 | 14.52 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.09 | 53.52 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.35 | 18.39 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.25 | 62.24 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement