Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEGFX vs HNCCX
AEGFX vs HNCCX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs HNCCX
American Funds EUPAC F1
Price$60.35
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.44B
Hartford International Growth C
Price$17.25
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets325.02M
AEGFX vs HNCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. HNCCX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Buy and HNCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. HNCCX (325M). AEGFX pays higher dividends than HNCCX: AEGFX (1.00) vs HNCCX (0.00). AEGFX was incepted earlier than HNCCX: AEGFX (24 years) vs HNCCX (24 years). HNCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than AEGFX (0.86). HNCCX (31.00) and AEGFX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. AEGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNCCX: AEGFX (250) vs HNCCX (2000). HNCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.80 vs. AEGFX (2.95). HNCCX return over 5 years is better than : 27.89 vs. AEGFX (18.14).
| AEGFX | HNCCX | AEGFX / HNCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 2.05 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 2.14 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.832 | 13.795 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 325M | 40,923% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.95 | 10.80 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.00 | 30.80 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.14 | 27.89 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.58 | 42.49 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement