Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEGFX vs HNCCX
AEGFX vs HNCCX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs HNCCX
American Funds EUPAC F1
Price$64.93
Change-$0.35 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.4B
Hartford International Growth C
Price$19.08
Change-$0.27 (-1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets372.85M
AEGFX vs HNCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. HNCCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Buy and HNCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. HNCCX (373M). AEGFX pays higher dividends than HNCCX: AEGFX (0.63) vs HNCCX (0.00). AEGFX was incepted earlier than HNCCX: AEGFX (25 years) vs HNCCX (24 years). HNCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than AEGFX (0.86). AEGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. HNCCX (31.00). AEGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNCCX: AEGFX (250) vs HNCCX (2000). HNCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.68 vs. AEGFX (10.18). HNCCX return over 5 years is better than : 26.14 vs. AEGFX (13.85).
| AEGFX | HNCCX | AEGFX / HNCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 2.05 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 2.14 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.455 | 27.723 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 138B | 373M | 36,997% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.18 | 24.68 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.67 | 86.42 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.85 | 26.14 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.04 | 73.34 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement