Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEGFX vs HNCCX
AEGFX vs HNCCX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs HNCCX
American Funds EUPAC F1
Price$63.63
Change-$0.13 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.84B
Hartford International Growth C
Price$18.64
Change-$0.04 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets356.66M
AEGFX vs HNCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. HNCCX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Hold and HNCCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. HNCCX (357M). AEGFX pays higher dividends than HNCCX: AEGFX (0.66) vs HNCCX (0.00). AEGFX was incepted earlier than HNCCX: AEGFX (25 years) vs HNCCX (24 years). HNCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than AEGFX (0.86). AEGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. HNCCX (31.00). AEGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNCCX: AEGFX (250) vs HNCCX (2000). HNCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.81 vs. AEGFX (10.13). HNCCX return over 5 years is better than : 24.20 vs. AEGFX (13.89).
| AEGFX | HNCCX | AEGFX / HNCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 2.05 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 2.14 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.024 | 23.300 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 137B | 357M | 38,375% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.13 | 22.81 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.31 | 67.83 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.89 | 24.20 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.71 | 69.00 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement