Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEGFX vs HNCCX
AEGFX vs HNCCX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs HNCCX
AEGFX vs HNCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. HNCCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Buy and HNCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 141B vs. HNCCX (504M). AEGFX pays higher dividends than HNCCX: AEGFX (2.55) vs HNCCX (0.00). AEGFX was incepted earlier than HNCCX: AEGFX (25 years) vs HNCCX (25 years). HNCCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than AEGFX (0.86). AEGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. HNCCX (36.00). AEGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNCCX: AEGFX (250) vs HNCCX (2000). HNCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.57 vs. AEGFX (8.16). HNCCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.07 vs. AEGFX (-3.42).
| AEGFX | HNCCX | AEGFX / HNCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 2.05 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 2.15 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.873 | 6.319 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 141B | 504M | 27,976% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.55 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.16 | 16.57 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.29 | 41.98 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.42 | 14.07 | -24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.28 | 78.01 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement