It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEIS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileAPWC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AEIS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
AEIS (@Electrical Products) experienced а -6.74% price change this week, while APWC (@Electrical Products) price change was -4.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.11%.
AEIS is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
APWC is expected to report earnings on Nov 27, 2024.
The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.
AEIS | APWC | AEIS / APWC | |
Capitalization | 3.81B | 28.5M | 13,382% |
EBITDA | 206M | -10.02M | -2,057% |
Gain YTD | 0.768 | 44.089 | 2% |
P/E Ratio | 29.29 | 6.57 | 446% |
Revenue | 1.66B | 459M | 361% |
Total Cash | 1.05B | 45M | 2,322% |
Total Debt | 1.02B | 58.1M | 1,761% |
AEIS | APWC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 44 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 67 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 89 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 82 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 17 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
APWC's Valuation (67) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as AEIS (74) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that APWC’s stock grew similarly to AEIS’s over the last 12 months.
AEIS's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APWC (89) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that AEIS’s stock grew somewhat faster than APWC’s over the last 12 months.
AEIS's SMR Rating (82) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as APWC (85) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that AEIS’s stock grew similarly to APWC’s over the last 12 months.
APWC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as AEIS (52) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that APWC’s stock grew similarly to AEIS’s over the last 12 months.
AEIS's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as APWC (17) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that AEIS’s stock grew similarly to APWC’s over the last 12 months.
AEIS | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago58% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago63% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago62% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago71% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
WBIRX | 29.44 | -0.19 | -0.64% |
William Blair International Growth R6 | |||
NWAUX | 17.37 | -0.14 | -0.80% |
Nationwide GQG US Quality Eq A | |||
ASUAX | 13.06 | -0.19 | -1.43% |
Virtus NFJ Global Sustainability A | |||
ALMCX | 7.35 | -0.11 | -1.47% |
Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth C | |||
TWCIX | 123.21 | -2.77 | -2.20% |
American Century Select Inv |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AEIS has been loosely correlated with NVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AEIS jumps, then NVT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AEIS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AEIS | 100% | -2.41% | ||
NVT - AEIS | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.53% | ||
HUBB - AEIS | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
PLPC - AEIS | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.30% | ||
ENS - AEIS | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
KE - AEIS | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.85% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that APWC and SLDP have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that APWC and SLDP's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To APWC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
APWC | 100% | -1.37% | ||
SLDP - APWC | 26% Poorly correlated | -3.77% | ||
NXU - APWC | 24% Poorly correlated | -4.84% | ||
GWH - APWC | 22% Poorly correlated | -28.92% | ||
MAXN - APWC | 20% Poorly correlated | -13.22% | ||
AEIS - APWC | 5% Poorly correlated | -2.41% | ||
More |