Advanced Energy Industries and Vertiv Holdings are two of the more closely watched beneficiaries of the AI infrastructure buildout, yet they serve that theme in different ways. Advanced Energy makes precision power-conversion, measurement, and control systems used inside semiconductor manufacturing and computing equipment. Vertiv builds and services the critical digital infrastructure—power, cooling, and thermal management—that keeps data centers running. This stock comparison is most relevant to investors and traders seeking exposure to AI-driven power demand while weighing the trade-offs between a smaller, component-level supplier and a larger, systems-level infrastructure provider.
Advanced Energy Industries designs and manufactures precision power products for semiconductor equipment, data-center computing, industrial and medical, and telecom applications. In its most recent quarterly report, the company delivered revenue of $574.1 million, up about 30% year over year, alongside non-GAAP earnings per share (EPS) that rose more than 80%. Semiconductor-equipment revenue reached a record, supported by demand for leading-edge logic and memory chips, while data-center computing revenue grew strongly as downstream supply constraints eased.
Management raised its full-year growth outlook and guided for further sequential revenue acceleration, citing momentum from hyperscale customers and a newer group of "second wave" data-center buyers. Gross and operating margins expanded meaningfully during recent market activity. Despite these strong results, AEIS shares gave back a portion of their gains in the following weeks, reflecting profit-taking and broader sector volatility rather than a deterioration in fundamentals.
Vertiv Holdings provides power management, thermal management, and services for data centers, communication networks, and commercial and industrial facilities. In its latest quarter, net sales rose 24% year over year, with the Americas and Asia-Pacific (APAC) regions each growing about 29%. Adjusted operating margin expanded to 22.6%, up 410 basis points (bps) year over year, and adjusted EPS climbed roughly 60%.
However, Vertiv's revenue came in below Street expectations by roughly $100 million, driven by temporary supply-chain congestion and timing shifts in large, multi-phase projects. The stock fell sharply in a single session following the report before recovering in subsequent weeks. Vertiv has remained active on the M&A (mergers and acquisitions) front, acquiring companies in liquid-cooling services, heat rejection, and microgrid power to broaden its AI data-center offering, and it has partnered on projects featuring NVIDIA hardware and 800-volt DC (direct current) power architectures.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots chosen for their suitability to current market conditions. While Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that collectively trade thousands of tickers, only a subset earns a place in this featured section. The bots vary widely in trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance, and the sets of tickers they cover, with published annualized returns spanning a broad range—from double-digit figures to more than 100% for certain high-volatility strategies. Each bot carries its own win rate, profit factor, and average trade duration, so traders can compare risk profiles before selecting an approach. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to review the currently featured strategies.
The two companies differ most clearly in business model and scale. AEIS is a components and subsystems supplier that feeds into semiconductor tools and computing hardware, giving it indirect but diversified exposure to AI demand. VRT is a full-suite infrastructure provider selling directly to data-center operators, which concentrates its exposure but also gives it larger contract sizes and a deeper service footprint.
On growth, both are expanding at a rapid clip, but Vertiv operates from a far larger base, with annual revenue guided toward roughly $14 billion versus Advanced Energy's run-rate of just over $2 billion. That size difference is reflected in valuation: Vertiv trades at a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple well above its industry average, while AEIS carries a more moderate multiple relative to its growth.
Risk profiles also diverge. AEIS's recent challenge has been share-price volatility after an earnings-driven run-up, while VRT's more visible issue has been execution risk—supply-chain congestion and project-timing slippage—along with scrutiny of its rapid acquisition pace. Sector exposure overlaps heavily in AI infrastructure, but AEIS adds a semiconductor cyclicality component that VRT lacks, while VRT adds direct exposure to hyperscale capital-expenditure cycles.
On balance, Tickeron's AI would likely favor Vertiv (VRT) for its larger scale, more direct leverage to the AI data-center buildout, and stronger relative analyst consensus, while acknowledging its elevated valuation and execution sensitivity. Advanced Energy (AEIS) presents a compelling alternative with faster margin expansion, record semiconductor momentum, and a comparatively more moderate multiple, but its smaller scale and post-earnings volatility introduce additional variability. The probabilistic edge currently tilts toward VRT for trend consistency and breadth of catalysts, with AEIS favored by those seeking component-level exposure at a lower valuation. Neither determination should be read as investment advice.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
AEIS moved below its 50-day moving average on October 08, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 39 of 44 similar past instances, the stock price decreased further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 89%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 13, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on AEIS as a result. In 64 of 89 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 72%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for AEIS turned negative on October 14, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 57 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 42 of the 57 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 74%.
The 10-day moving average for AEIS crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 14, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 14 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.
The 50-day moving average for AEIS moved below the 200-day moving average on September 10, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where AEIS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 69%.
The RSI Indicator entered the oversold zone -- be on the watch for AEIS's price rising or consolidating in the future. That's also the time to consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 4 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +7.97% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where AEIS advanced for three days, in 233 of 316 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
AEIS may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 214 of 266 cases where AEIS Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 80%.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 45 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 86, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 53 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 62 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. AEIS’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 79 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (6.548) is normal, around the industry mean (7.632). P/E Ratio (41.185) is within average values for comparable stocks, (54.807). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.180) is also within normal values, averaging (2.900). Dividend Yield (0.002) settles around the average of (0.005) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (5.048) is also within normal values, averaging (8.019).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 79 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The 50-day moving average for VRT moved below the 200-day moving average on September 30, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 06, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on VRT as a result. In 57 of 75 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 76%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for VRT turned negative on October 13, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 49 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 36 of the 49 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 73%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where VRT declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 77%.
The Aroon Indicator for VRT entered a downward trend on October 16, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 2 days, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 4 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +3.05% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where VRT advanced for three days, in 308 of 355 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 87%.
VRT may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 24 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 44 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 86, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 63 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 64 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. VRT’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 91 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (16.704) is normal, around the industry mean (7.632). P/E Ratio (45.668) is within average values for comparable stocks, (54.807). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.823) is also within normal values, averaging (2.900). Dividend Yield (0.001) settles around the average of (0.005) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (8.177) is also within normal values, averaging (8.019).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 95 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
AEIS | VRT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 44 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | 24 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 63 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AEIS's Valuation (79) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as VRT (91) in the null industry. This means that AEIS’s stock grew similarly to VRT’s over the last 12 months.
VRT's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as AEIS (45) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that VRT’s stock grew similarly to AEIS’s over the last 12 months.
VRT's SMR Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as AEIS (53) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that VRT’s stock grew similarly to AEIS’s over the last 12 months.
AEIS's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as VRT (64) in the null industry. This means that AEIS’s stock grew similarly to VRT’s over the last 12 months.
VRT's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as AEIS (79) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that VRT’s stock grew similarly to AEIS’s over the last 12 months.
| AEIS | VRT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 74% | 14 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 84% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEIS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while VRT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AEIS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
AEIS (@Electrical Products) experienced а -17.53% price change this week, while VRT (@Electrical Products) price change was -14.98% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was -13.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -17.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was -28.65%.
AEIS is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
VRT is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EPX.X | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Ellipsis cryptocurrency | |||
| LIT.X | 3.114032 | -0.067056 | -2.11% |
| Lighter cryptocurrency | |||
| STRAX.X | 0.010449 | -0.000237 | -2.22% |
| Xertra cryptocurrency | |||
| RIF.X | 0.078200 | -0.002475 | -3.07% |
| Rootstock Infrastructure Framework cryptocurrency | |||
| HFT.X | 0.005997 | -0.000207 | -3.33% |
| Hashflow cryptocurrency | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRT has been closely correlated with NVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VRT jumps, then NVT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VRT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRT | 100% | -3.88% | ||
| NVT - VRT | 71% Closely correlated | -2.54% | ||
| AEIS - VRT | 68% Closely correlated | -5.57% | ||
| POWL - VRT | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.33% | ||
| HUBB - VRT | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| BE - VRT | 59% Loosely correlated | -6.34% | ||
More | ||||