APWC
Price
$1.48
Change
-$0.05 (-3.27%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
61.02M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FCEL
Price
$19.08
Change
-$1.95 (-9.27%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.52B
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

APWC vs FCEL

APWC vs FCEL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APWC vs. FCEL commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APWC is a Hold and FCEL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (APWC: $1.48 vs. FCEL: $19.08)
Brand notoriety: APWC: Not notable vs. FCEL: Notable
Both companies represent the Electrical Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APWC: 2% vs. FCEL: 50%
Market capitalization -- APWC: $61.02M vs. FCEL: $1.52B
APWC [@Electrical Products] is valued at $61.02M. FCEL’s [@Electrical Products] market capitalization is $1.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electrical Products] industry ranges from $300.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electrical Products] industry is $6.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APWC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFCEL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • APWC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FCEL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCEL is a better buy in the long-term than APWC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APWC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCEL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APWC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • FCEL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCEL is a better buy in the short-term than APWC.

Price Growth

APWC (@Electrical Products) experienced а -9.76% price change this week, while FCEL (@Electrical Products) price change was -35.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was -11.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -14.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCEL is expected to report earnings on Sep 08, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electrical Products (-11.87% weekly)

The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCEL($1.53B) has a higher market cap than APWC($61M). FCEL YTD gains are higher at: 161.012 vs. APWC (-20.639). APWC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.4M vs. FCEL (-173.15M). FCEL has more cash in the bank: 373M vs. APWC (35.3M). APWC has less debt than FCEL: APWC (44.2M) vs FCEL (160M). APWC has higher revenues than FCEL: APWC (492M) vs FCEL (168M).
APWCFCELAPWC / FCEL
Capitalization61M1.53B4%
EBITDA10.4M-173.15M-6%
Gain YTD-20.639161.012-13%
P/E Ratio4.93N/A-
Revenue492M168M293%
Total Cash35.3M373M9%
Total Debt44.2M160M28%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APWC vs FCEL: Fundamental Ratings
APWC
FCEL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9871
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4934
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1650

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FCEL's Valuation (37) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as APWC (58) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that FCEL’s stock grew similarly to APWC’s over the last 12 months.

FCEL's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as APWC (100) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that FCEL’s stock grew similarly to APWC’s over the last 12 months.

APWC's SMR Rating (90) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as FCEL (98) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that APWC’s stock grew similarly to FCEL’s over the last 12 months.

FCEL's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as APWC (49) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that FCEL’s stock grew similarly to APWC’s over the last 12 months.

APWC's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as FCEL (100) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that APWC’s stock grew similarly to FCEL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APWCFCEL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APWC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FCEL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
POSAX9.66N/A
N/A
Principal Global Real Estate Sec A
TQGIX24.01N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Integrated Global Eq I
WLGYX38.69N/A
N/A
Nomura Large Cap Growth Y
JSIGX24.03N/A
N/A
Jacob Small Cap Growth Institutional
JRSAX12.97-0.09
-0.69%
JH Adaptive Risk Mgd U.S. Eq A

APWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that APWC and SLDP have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that APWC and SLDP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APWC
1D Price
Change %
APWC100%
-3.27%
SLDP - APWC
26%
Poorly correlated
-3.88%
XPON - APWC
23%
Poorly correlated
-8.09%
GWH - APWC
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.14%
FCEL - APWC
17%
Poorly correlated
-9.27%
HUBB - APWC
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.83%
More

FCEL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCEL has been closely correlated with RUN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCEL jumps, then RUN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCEL
1D Price
Change %
FCEL100%
-9.27%
RUN - FCEL
66%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
PLUG - FCEL
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.69%
ENPH - FCEL
57%
Loosely correlated
-3.95%
CSIQ - FCEL
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.93%
SHLS - FCEL
52%
Loosely correlated
-6.19%
More