AEM
Price
$186.46
Change
+$6.10 (+3.38%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
94.1B
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CGAU
Price
$21.51
Change
+$0.27 (+1.27%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
4.2B
79 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AEM vs CGAU

AEM vs CGAU Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) vs. Centerra Gold Inc. (CGAU) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • AEM is a larger-scale gold producer with diversified operations across multiple jurisdictions, while CGAU operates a more concentrated portfolio focused on key assets in Central Asia and North America.
  • Recent market activity shows AEM experiencing a modest pullback amid broader sector rotation, whereas CGAU has maintained relatively stable pricing with positive year-to-date momentum.
  • Both companies benefit from elevated gold prices, but AEM reports stronger historical free cash flow generation and shareholder returns through dividends and buybacks.
  • Upcoming quarterly results—AEM on July 29 and CGAU on July 28—represent near-term catalysts that could influence sentiment in the gold mining sector.
  • AEM exhibits lower volatility relative to its peer group, while CGAU has delivered higher percentage gains over the trailing twelve months.
  • Market positioning favors AEM for scale and consistency, with CGAU offering greater upside potential tied to operational execution and cost management.

Introduction

Investors and traders seeking exposure to the gold mining sector often compare established producers to evaluate differences in scale, operational efficiency, and risk profiles. AEM and CGAU represent two distinct approaches within the same industry: one a large-cap leader with extensive international operations and another a mid-cap player with focused asset development. This comparison provides relevant insights for portfolio managers assessing relative performance, growth drivers, and sector positioning amid fluctuating commodity prices and macroeconomic conditions. Both stocks appeal to those monitoring precious metals trends and earnings catalysts over the coming weeks.

AEM Overview and Recent Performance

Agnico Eagle Mines Limited operates as one of the world’s largest gold producers, with mines spanning Canada, Australia, Finland, and Mexico. The company emphasizes low all-in sustaining costs and consistent production growth through brownfield expansions. In recent weeks, AEM shares have traded lower amid sector-wide adjustments following a period of strong gains earlier in the year. Performance has been influenced by profit-taking and anticipation of second-quarter results scheduled for July 29. Broader market activity reflects solid underlying fundamentals from prior periods, including record operating margins driven by higher realized gold prices, though near-term sentiment remains tempered by macroeconomic uncertainty and upcoming earnings disclosure.

CGAU Overview and Recent Performance

Centerra Gold Inc. focuses on gold and copper production primarily through its Mount Milligan operation in Canada and the Öksüt mine in Turkey. The mid-cap miner has pursued cost discipline and asset optimization in recent periods. In recent market activity, CGAU has shown relative resilience with positive year-to-date returns, supported by favorable gold price environments and operational execution. Recent weeks have featured steady trading volumes and limited downside volatility compared with larger peers. Sentiment has been shaped by the company’s upcoming second-quarter results release on July 28, alongside ongoing efforts to maintain production guidance and manage geopolitical and operational risks inherent to its asset base.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron maintains a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to navigate dynamic market conditions across thousands of tickers. While hundreds of bots with varied strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics are available, only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing trends and risk parameters earn placement in the Trending AI Robots section. These systems employ diverse approaches, from momentum-based entries to mean-reversion tactics, each calibrated to specific market regimes. Available bots display a range of historical win rates, drawdown metrics, and trade frequencies that traders can review for suitability. For additional details on the current lineup and performance data, visit Trending AI Robots.

Head-to-Head Comparison

In terms of business model, AEM benefits from greater geographic diversification and production scale, reducing single-asset concentration risk relative to CGAU’s more focused operations. Growth drivers for AEM center on large-scale expansions and consistent reserve replacement, while CGAU emphasizes cost optimization and targeted development at existing sites. Recent momentum favors CGAU on a percentage basis over the trailing year, though AEM has delivered more stable absolute returns with lower beta exposure. Risk factors include regulatory and labor considerations for AEM’s multi-jurisdictional footprint versus potential currency and regional exposure for CGAU. Sector exposure remains similar for both as gold producers, yet market sentiment currently reflects a preference for larger, more liquid names amid earnings season.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, operational scale, and relative positioning within the gold sector, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to AEM. Its larger production base and track record of free cash flow generation provide a buffer against short-term volatility, while upcoming results offer a clear catalyst for reassessment. CGAU presents attractive upside in a continued gold bull environment but carries comparatively higher execution risk tied to its asset concentration.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AEM vs. CGAU commentary
Aug 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEM is a Buy and CGAU is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2026
Stock price -- (AEM: $186.46 vs. CGAU: $21.51)
Brand notoriety: AEM and CGAU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEM: 97% vs. CGAU: 56%
Market capitalization -- AEM: $94.1B vs. CGAU: $4.2B
AEM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $94.1B. CGAU’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $4.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $134.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $13.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCGAU’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AEM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CGAU’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGAU is a better buy in the long-term than AEM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AEM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CGAU’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AEM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CGAU’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AEM is a better buy in the short-term than CGAU.

Price Growth

AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а +4.27% price change this week, while CGAU (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

AEM is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

CGAU is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.53% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEM($94.1B) has a higher market cap than CGAU($4.2B). AEM has higher P/E ratio than CGAU: AEM (15.96) vs CGAU (6.87). CGAU YTD gains are higher at: 49.687 vs. AEM (10.455). AEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.5B vs. CGAU (1B). AEM has more cash in the bank: 3.48B vs. CGAU (457M). CGAU has less debt than AEM: CGAU (45.8M) vs AEM (320M). AEM has higher revenues than CGAU: AEM (14.5B) vs CGAU (1.72B).
AEMCGAUAEM / CGAU
Capitalization94.1B4.2B2,243%
EBITDA10.5B1B1,046%
Gain YTD10.45549.68721%
P/E Ratio15.966.87232%
Revenue14.5B1.72B841%
Total Cash3.48B457M761%
Total Debt320M45.8M699%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AEM vs CGAU: Fundamental Ratings
AEM
CGAU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4745
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4521
SMR RATING
1..100
4331
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4236
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8298
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGAU's Valuation (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AEM (94). This means that CGAU’s stock grew significantly faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.

CGAU's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as AEM (45). This means that CGAU’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

CGAU's SMR Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as AEM (43). This means that CGAU’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

CGAU's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as AEM (42). This means that CGAU’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as CGAU (98). This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to CGAU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AEMCGAU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CGAU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NKX12.440.04
+0.34%
Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund
FMED30.210.09
+0.31%
Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF
FMDE42.960.10
+0.23%
Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Core ETF
GTOQ22.40N/A
N/A
Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF
DAT49.90-0.52
-1.04%
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF