AEM
Price
$167.65
Change
+$1.16 (+0.70%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
84.64B
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SAND
Price
$12.12
Change
-$0.78 (-6.05%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
3.45B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AEM vs SAND

Header iconAEM vs SAND Comparison
Open Charts AEM vs SANDBanner chart's image
Agnico Eagle Mines
Price$167.65
Change+$1.16 (+0.70%)
Volume$13.36K
Capitalization84.64B
Sandstorm Gold
Price$12.12
Change-$0.78 (-6.05%)
Volume$14.51M
Capitalization3.45B
AEM vs SAND Comparison Chart in %
AEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SAND
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AEM vs. SAND commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEM is a Hold and SAND is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (AEM: $166.49 vs. SAND: $12.12)
Brand notoriety: AEM and SAND are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEM: 59% vs. SAND: 142%
Market capitalization -- AEM: $84.64B vs. SAND: $3.45B
AEM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $84.64B. SAND’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $109.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSAND’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AEM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SAND’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AEM and SAND are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AEM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAND’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AEM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SAND’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AEM is a better buy in the short-term than SAND.

Price Growth

AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -0.80% price change this week, while SAND (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +68.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

AEM is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

SAND is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-0.08% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEM($84.6B) has a higher market cap than SAND($3.45B). SAND has higher P/E ratio than AEM: SAND (101.00) vs AEM (24.51). SAND (117.204) and AEM (115.098) have similar YTD gains . AEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.84B vs. SAND (145M). AEM has more cash in the bank: 2.36B vs. SAND (14.8M). SAND has less debt than AEM: SAND (315M) vs AEM (336M). AEM has higher revenues than SAND: AEM (10.6B) vs SAND (194M).
AEMSANDAEM / SAND
Capitalization84.6B3.45B2,454%
EBITDA6.84B145M4,719%
Gain YTD115.098117.20498%
P/E Ratio24.51101.0024%
Revenue10.6B194M5,464%
Total Cash2.36B14.8M15,912%
Total Debt336M315M107%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AEM vs SAND: Fundamental Ratings
AEM
SAND
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1554
SMR RATING
1..100
5285
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3939
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8810
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAND's Valuation (80) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as AEM (96) in the null industry. This means that SAND’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAND (54) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that AEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAND’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAND (85) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that AEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAND’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as SAND (39) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to SAND’s over the last 12 months.

SAND's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for AEM (88) in the null industry. This means that SAND’s stock grew significantly faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AEMSAND
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
78%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SAND
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DUKH24.330.01
+0.04%
Ocean Park High Income ETF
GRX9.41N/A
N/A
Gabelli Healthcare & Wellness Trust (The)
ESGV116.65-1.03
-0.88%
Vanguard ESG US Stock ETF
OVF28.55-0.33
-1.15%
Overlay Shares Foreign Equity ETF
QQH75.03-1.21
-1.59%
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF