AEM
Price
$117.32
Change
+$2.66 (+2.32%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
29.62B
80 days until earnings call
SMAGF
Price
$0.67
Change
+$0.07 (+11.67%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
39.28M
Ad is loading...

AEM vs SMAGF

Header iconAEM vs SMAGF Comparison
Open Charts AEM vs SMAGFBanner chart's image
Agnico Eagle Mines
Price$117.32
Change+$2.66 (+2.32%)
Volume$2.38M
Capitalization29.62B
Soma Gold
Price$0.67
Change+$0.07 (+11.67%)
Volume$32.7K
Capitalization39.28M
AEM vs SMAGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AEM vs. SMAGF commentary
May 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEM is a Hold and SMAGF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 11, 2025
Stock price -- (AEM: $117.32 vs. SMAGF: $0.67)
Brand notoriety: AEM and SMAGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEM: 64% vs. SMAGF: 83%
Market capitalization -- AEM: $29.62B vs. SMAGF: $39.28M
AEM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $29.62B. SMAGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $39.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMAGF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AEM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMAGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMAGF is a better buy in the long-term than AEM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AEM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • AEM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а +5.58% price change this week, while SMAGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +16.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

AEM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.13% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEM($29.6B) has a higher market cap than SMAGF($39.3M). SMAGF has higher P/E ratio than AEM: SMAGF (625.00) vs AEM (15.52). SMAGF YTD gains are higher at: 79.570 vs. AEM (50.640). AEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.94B vs. SMAGF (16.8M). AEM has more cash in the bank: 349M vs. SMAGF (680K). SMAGF has less debt than AEM: SMAGF (29.6M) vs AEM (2.01B). AEM has higher revenues than SMAGF: AEM (6.63B) vs SMAGF (50.3M).
AEMSMAGFAEM / SMAGF
Capitalization29.6B39.3M75,318%
EBITDA3.94B16.8M23,464%
Gain YTD50.64079.57064%
P/E Ratio15.52625.002%
Revenue6.63B50.3M13,175%
Total Cash349M680K51,324%
Total Debt2.01B29.6M6,774%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AEM vs SMAGF: Fundamental Ratings
AEM
SMAGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7455
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2123
SMR RATING
1..100
6292
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3836
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
985
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMAGF's Valuation (74) in the null industry is in the same range as AEM (96). This means that SMAGF’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as SMAGF (23). This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to SMAGF’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's SMR Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as SMAGF (92). This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to SMAGF’s over the last 12 months.

SMAGF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as AEM (38). This means that SMAGF’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

SMAGF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AEM (98). This means that SMAGF’s stock grew significantly faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AEM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AGGH20.220.04
+0.20%
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
MEAR50.00-0.01
-0.02%
iShares Short Maturity Muni Bd Act ETF
HERO28.31-0.02
-0.09%
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF
IWP126.45-0.33
-0.26%
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
ASHS28.19-0.21
-0.74%
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 CHN A SmCp ETF

SMAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMAGF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMAGF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMAGF
1D Price
Change %
SMAGF100%
+10.77%
PAAS - SMAGF
43%
Loosely correlated
+6.50%
MAG - SMAGF
40%
Loosely correlated
+6.21%
MTA - SMAGF
39%
Loosely correlated
+3.03%
HL - SMAGF
38%
Loosely correlated
+5.53%
AEM - SMAGF
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.32%
More