Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEMSX vs RNWHX
AEMSX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts AEMSX vs RNWHX
AEMSX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEMSX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEMSX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. AEMSX (1.02B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than AEMSX: RNWHX (1.15) vs AEMSX (0.68). AEMSX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: AEMSX (17 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). AEMSX (1.30) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. AEMSX (35.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEMSX: RNWHX (250) vs AEMSX (1000000). AEMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.03 vs. RNWHX (13.14). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 16.26 vs. AEMSX (8.40).
| AEMSX | RNWHX | AEMSX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.72 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.72 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.086 | 13.935 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 90B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 1.15 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.03 | 13.14 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.98 | 50.66 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.40 | 16.26 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.14 | 105.79 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers