Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEMSX vs RNWHX
AEMSX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts AEMSX vs RNWHX
AEMSX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEMSX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEMSX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. AEMSX (1.06B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than AEMSX: RNWHX (1.14) vs AEMSX (0.66). AEMSX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: AEMSX (17 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). AEMSX (1.30) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. AEMSX (35.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEMSX: RNWHX (250) vs AEMSX (1000000). AEMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.44 vs. RNWHX (19.47). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 14.04 vs. AEMSX (4.88).
| AEMSX | RNWHX | AEMSX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.72 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.72 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.944 | 12.651 | 205% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 90.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.14 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.44 | 19.47 | 213% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.78 | 43.67 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.88 | 14.04 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.30 | 107.31 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers