AEP
Price
$135.54
Change
+$0.62 (+0.46%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
73.75B
4 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LNT
Price
$74.94
Change
+$0.52 (+0.70%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
19.36B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AEP vs LNT

AEP vs LNT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? American Electric Power (AEP) vs. Alliant Energy (LNT) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • AEP is a significantly larger regulated utility with a market capitalization exceeding $70 billion, whereas LNT operates as a mid-cap utility with a market cap around $18 billion, concentrated in Wisconsin and Iowa.
  • AEP projects a long-term operating earnings per share (EPS) growth rate of 7% to 9%, supported by a $72 billion five-year capital plan and 56 gigawatts of incremental load commitments by 2030.
  • LNT anticipates a 50% increase in peak load demand by 2030 driven by 3 gigawatts of contracted data center demand, underpinning a $13.4 billion four-year capital expenditure plan.
  • LNT demonstrates superior profitability metrics including a higher net margin (18.6% vs. 16.3%) and stronger return on equity (ROE) of approximately 11.4% compared to AEP's 10.2%.
  • Both stocks exhibit low beta values (below 0.55), making them defensive holdings, but AEP currently trades at a lower forward price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple, offering a potential value entry relative to LNT.

Introduction

Investors navigating the regulated electric utility sector often face a choice between scale and focus. American Electric Power (AEP) and Alliant Energy (LNT) represent two distinct approaches to utility investing — one a sprawling multi-state giant, the other a concentrated Midwestern operator riding a powerful data center demand wave. Both are dividend-paying, regulated utilities with strong investment-grade credit profiles, yet their growth narratives, capital deployment strategies, and market valuations differ in ways that matter to income-oriented investors, total-return seekers, and those evaluating relative strength in the current market environment. This comparison examines how these two electric utilities stack up across recent performance, business fundamentals, and AI-driven market analysis.

AEP Overview and Recent Performance

American Electric Power (AEP), headquartered in Columbus, Ohio, is one of the largest investor-owned electric utilities in the United States, serving approximately 5.6 million customers across 11 states. The company owns the nation's largest transmission network, a strategic asset that has become increasingly valuable amid accelerating electrification trends. In recent market activity, AEP shares have demonstrated notable upward momentum, with the stock gaining approximately 29% during 2025 and adding further gains into mid-2026, supported by robust earnings delivery and an expanding capital investment blueprint.

A significant catalyst for AEP has been the dramatic upward revision of its load growth expectations. The company initially guided for 28 gigawatts (GW) of incremental load by 2030, a figure that was subsequently doubled to 56 GW — all backed by signed customer agreements. This extraordinary demand outlook, fueled largely by data center and industrial electrification, supported the announcement of a $72 billion five-year capital plan and an elevated long-term operating EPS growth rate of 7% to 9%. Full-year 2025 operating earnings reached $5.97 per share, and management has set 2026 operating EPS guidance at $6.15 to $6.45. The rate base is projected to grow at a 10% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) to $128 billion by 2030, providing a highly visible earnings trajectory that has resonated with institutional investors.

LNT Overview and Recent Performance

Alliant Energy (LNT), based in Madison, Wisconsin, is a focused regulated utility serving approximately 1 million electric customers and 425,000 natural gas customers through its two primary subsidiaries: Interstate Power and Light Company (IPL) in Iowa and Wisconsin Power and Light Company (WPL) in Wisconsin. While smaller in geographic reach than AEP, LNT has carved out a compelling growth narrative centered on renewable energy investment and surging data center demand within its service territory.

In recent months, LNT shares have posted steady gains, reflecting investor confidence in the company's execution and load growth story. The stock delivered a total return exceeding 13% in 2025 and has continued to trend higher through the first half of 2026. The standout development for LNT has been the rapid expansion of contracted data center demand, which now totals 3 GW — representing a projected 50% increase in peak load demand by 2030, a rate of growth described by management as industry-leading on a proportional basis. This demand visibility prompted a 17% increase in the company's four-year capital expenditure forecast to $13.4 billion for 2026 through 2029. Full-year 2025 ongoing EPS came in at $3.22, representing 6% growth over the prior year, and 2026 ongoing EPS guidance has been set at $3.36 to $3.46. LNT has also raised its annual dividend target for 2026 to $2.14 per share, extending a track record of 22 consecutive years of dividend increases.

Trending AI Robots

For traders and investors seeking an analytical edge, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of the platform's most capable AI-driven trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across diverse market conditions. Each bot operates with its own distinct trading style, strategy, and timeframe — ranging from short-term swing trading to longer-term trend-following approaches — and comes with its own historical performance statistics, win rates, and risk profiles. Only the bots that demonstrate the strongest adaptability and consistency in prevailing market conditions earn placement in the Trending AI Robots section, making it a resource for those who want to see which strategies are currently generating the most promising signals. Browsing this curated list can help traders identify automated tools aligned with their own investment philosophy, whether that involves the steady utility sector or more volatile market segments.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When comparing AEP and LNT side by side, the most immediate distinction is scale. AEP generates annual revenues exceeding $21 billion and maintains a market capitalization north of $70 billion, while LNT operates at roughly one-fifth that size. This scale advantage gives AEP greater diversification across regulatory jurisdictions — 11 states versus two — which can help mitigate the impact of adverse regulatory decisions in any single jurisdiction. However, LNT's concentration allows for deeper regulatory relationships and a more agile strategic pivot toward clean energy and data center load growth.

On profitability, LNT holds the edge. Its net margin of approximately 18.6% and ROE of roughly 11.4% surpass AEP's 16.3% net margin and 10.2% ROE, reflecting a leaner operational structure and a generation mix increasingly weighted toward lower-cost renewable assets. From a growth perspective, AEP has set the bar higher with its 7% to 9% long-term EPS growth target, outpacing LNT's historically consistent but more modest 6% CAGR. However, LNT's data center-driven demand growth is proportionally more transformative given the company's smaller baseline.

Valuation is another key differentiator. AEP trades at a forward P/E multiple in the mid-to-high teens, a discount to LNT's multiple in the low-to-mid 20s, making AEP appear more attractively priced on an earnings basis. Both offer comparable dividend yields near 2.8% to 3.0%, though LNT has the longer streak of consecutive annual dividend increases at 22 years. From a risk standpoint, both stocks carry betas around 0.52 to 0.55, indicating low sensitivity to broader market swings — a hallmark of the regulated utility sector. AEP carries somewhat higher leverage, but its massive and growing rate base provides strong cash flow visibility to service that debt.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, growth catalyst visibility, and relative valuation, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely lean toward AEP in the current environment — but with important qualifications. AEP's combination of a discounted forward P/E multiple, an upwardly revised long-term growth rate of 7% to 9%, and a staggering 56 GW load growth pipeline supported by signed customer agreements creates a compelling risk-reward profile that quantitative models often favor. The stock's sustained price momentum through recent months also supports a constructive trend signal. That said, LNT would likely rank very close behind, with its superior profitability metrics, stronger balance sheet, and proportionally massive data center demand story offering an equally investable thesis — particularly for strategies that prioritize operational efficiency and dividend reliability. In probabilistic terms, the AI would likely express higher confidence in AEP's near-to-medium-term trend consistency while acknowledging that both stocks represent high-quality holdings within the regulated utility space, each with distinct strengths suited to different portfolio objectives.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AEP vs. LNT commentary
Jul 26, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEP is a Buy and LNT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2026
Stock price -- (AEP: $135.54 vs. LNT: $74.94)
Brand notoriety: AEP and LNT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEP: 37% vs. LNT: 49%
Market capitalization -- AEP: $73.75B vs. LNT: $19.36B
AEP [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $73.75B. LNT’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $19.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $187.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $32.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLNT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AEP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • LNT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AEP and LNT are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AEP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LNT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AEP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LNT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AEP and LNT are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AEP (@Electric Utilities) experienced а +2.57% price change this week, while LNT (@Electric Utilities) price change was +0.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +1.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

AEP is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

LNT is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+1.71% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEP($73.7B) has a higher market cap than LNT($19.4B). AEP has higher P/E ratio than LNT: AEP (100.25) vs LNT (23.57). AEP YTD gains are higher at: 19.334 vs. LNT (17.082). AEP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.4B vs. LNT (2.03B). AEP has more cash in the bank: 516M vs. LNT (115M). LNT has less debt than AEP: LNT (11.8B) vs AEP (51.8B). AEP has higher revenues than LNT: AEP (22.4B) vs LNT (4.42B).
AEPLNTAEP / LNT
Capitalization73.7B19.4B380%
EBITDA9.4B2.03B464%
Gain YTD19.33417.082113%
P/E Ratio100.2523.57425%
Revenue22.4B4.42B507%
Total Cash516M115M449%
Total Debt51.8B11.8B439%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AEP vs LNT: Fundamental Ratings
AEP
LNT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8084
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1726
SMR RATING
1..100
6467
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3147
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
542
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LNT's Valuation (61) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as AEP (79). This means that LNT’s stock grew similarly to AEP’s over the last 12 months.

AEP's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as LNT (26). This means that AEP’s stock grew similarly to LNT’s over the last 12 months.

AEP's SMR Rating (64) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as LNT (67). This means that AEP’s stock grew similarly to LNT’s over the last 12 months.

AEP's Price Growth Rating (31) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as LNT (47). This means that AEP’s stock grew similarly to LNT’s over the last 12 months.

AEP's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LNT (42). This means that AEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than LNT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AEPLNT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AEP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LNT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MNDO1.020.04
+4.12%
MIND C.T.I. Ltd
WMB74.00-1.25
-1.66%
Williams Companies
SRRK47.67-1.81
-3.66%
Scholar Rock Holding Corp
NVAX7.46-0.36
-4.66%
Novavax
MGNX3.70-0.31
-7.73%
MacroGenics

AEP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AEP has been closely correlated with LNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AEP jumps, then LNT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AEP
1D Price
Change %
AEP100%
+0.46%
LNT - AEP
74%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
BKH - AEP
71%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
EVRG - AEP
70%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
EXC - AEP
68%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
ETR - AEP
68%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
More

LNT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNT has been closely correlated with AEE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LNT jumps, then AEE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNT
1D Price
Change %
LNT100%
+0.70%
AEE - LNT
86%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
OGE - LNT
83%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
EVRG - LNT
82%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
CMS - LNT
82%
Closely correlated
+0.74%
DTE - LNT
81%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
More