Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs FNGAX
AEPCX vs FNGAX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FNGAX
AEPCX vs FNGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FNGAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Hold and FNGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. FNGAX (627M). AEPCX pays higher dividends than FNGAX: AEPCX (2.06) vs FNGAX (0.32). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FNGAX: AEPCX (25 years) vs FNGAX (18 years). AEPCX (1.58) is less costly to investors than FNGAX (1.21). AEPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FNGAX (25.70). AEPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNGAX: AEPCX (250) vs FNGAX (1000). AEPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.08 vs. FNGAX (-1.11). AEPCX return over 5 years is better than : -9.45 vs. FNGAX (-20.86).
| AEPCX | FNGAX | AEPCX / FNGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.12 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.21 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.272 | 0.289 | 1,131% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 143B | 627M | 22,807% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.06 | 0.32 | 641% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.08 | -1.11 | -821% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.46 | 11.22 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.45 | -20.86 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.26 | 74.47 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement